Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-33275House OversightOther

Multiple alleged sexual misconduct incidents involving former Case Western professor now at ASU

The passage details several specific allegations of sexual harassment by a university professor (identified as Dr. Krauss) spanning 2008‑2011, including documented university disciplinary corresponden University associate VP Susan Nickel‑Schindewolf sent a formal letter on Sep 4, 2008 citing possible The professor was prohibited from contacting the student and required dean/department chair approv

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021430
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage details several specific allegations of sexual harassment by a university professor (identified as Dr. Krauss) spanning 2008‑2011, including documented university disciplinary corresponden University associate VP Susan Nickel‑Schindewolf sent a formal letter on Sep 4, 2008 citing possible The professor was prohibited from contacting the student and required dean/department chair approv

Tags

investigationsexual-harassmentinstitutional-accountabilityfaculty-conductacademic-ethicslegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightuniversity-misconductsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
° Later, in a regular column for the school paper, she described her experiences with you, without mentioning you by name. “There was even one particular creep of a professor who once told me he thought differently of me compared to other students and asked me to dinner: a situation so disturbing that it left me upset for weeks afterward,” she wrote. ° She was then approached by a dean at the university, who suspected that she was referring to you, based on a previously reported incident with another student. He encouraged her to make a complaint, and she did. ° University investigators interviewed both you and the student. ° On September 4, 2008, Susan Nickel-Schindewolf, the university’s associate vice president for student affairs, wrote to the student, telling her that the investigation was complete. She wrote that you had been told: “This type of behavior could constitute sexual harassment in violation of the university’s sexual harassment policy.” ° The letter also stated that you were prohibited from making contact with the student as long as she remained at Case. ° The letter also stated that you are required to get approval from the dean or the chair of the physics department before setting foot on the campus again. ° The letter also stated, “Dr. Krauss expressed regret about having a negative impact on you, and also his willingness to use this complaint as an opportunity to reflect and improve on his future interactions with students.” ° By then, you had already left Case, taking up your current position at Arizona State University the month before. ° “The opportunities being offered at ASU are simply too great to turn down at this stage in my career,” you told Case colleagues, in an email announcing your departure on April 16, 2008. Incident 3: ° A former Case Western physics department administrator confirmed that she had reported a previous incident involving a student who had confided in her about your inappropriate behavior towards her. Incident 4: ° You met a student from another university, an atheist activist, in March 2008 at the American Atheists Convention in Minneapolis. She wanted to expand the atheist group she ran at the midwestern university she was attending, and hoped to convince you to come and speak. You initially seemed enthusiastic. ° During the convention, attendees including you and Richard Dawkins went for dinner with the student and volunteers for Dawkins’ foundation. ° Afterwards, the student invited you to join the volunteers for a drink. ° You asked her to come get you in your hotel room. She was wary of your intentions, and so brought a male friend with her. Opening the door to find them both there, you informed her you had decided not to go. ° You met this student again at the American Atheists Convention in Des Moines, lowa, in April 2011. ° You pulled over a chair for her in the bar, and then started running your hand up her leg under the table. ° She tried to shift her body away from you, and you persisted in putting your hand on her leg. She crossed her legs, and you kept trying. Then she turned her entire body away. Incident 5: ° This incident allegedly occurred on in May 2011 on a CFI cruise. We understand that CFI staff were informed that you had propositioned a female cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join you and your female companion for sex in your cabin.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferring

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Internal email chain about Lawrence Krauss responding to BuzzFeed sexual harassment inquiry

Internal email chain about Lawrence Krauss responding to BuzzFeed sexual harassment inquiry The passage contains only routine internal communications about how to reply to a media inquiry. It mentions a well‑known academic but provides no concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable leads beyond the existence of an allegation. The content is low‑value for investigation and adds little new information. Key insights: Lawrence Krauss is being contacted by BuzzFeed regarding sexual harassment allegations.; Krauss is unsure how to respond and mentions a prior consensual encounter claim from 2006.; The email includes a copy to 'nancy dahl' and a sender named Peter Aldhous.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed News inquiry into multiple sexual misconduct allegations against physicist Lawrence Krauss, including alleged assaults, university investi...

The passage details specific alleged incidents, dates, and university actions that provide concrete leads (emails, investigation letters, complaints) and connects Krauss to high‑profile institutions ( Six distinct alleged incidents spanning 2006‑2016, with documented university correspondence (e.g., Formal complaints filed with Arizona State University, Australian National University, and New Col

8p
House OversightUnknown

Lawrence Krauss email discussing alleged sexual harassment complaints and his responses

Lawrence Krauss email discussing alleged sexual harassment complaints and his responses The email provides a first‑hand account from a high‑profile scientist (Krauss) about multiple alleged harassment incidents, including references to a student complaint, a possible hot‑tub allegation, and a cruise allegation. It offers specific names, dates, and institutional contexts (AAAS, CFI, Dawkins Foundation) that could be followed up, but the claims are largely self‑serving denials with limited concrete evidence, making it a moderate‑value lead. Key insights: Krauss admits to a consensual necking with a woman but denies forced contact.; He references a female physics student who complained after he helped her obtain a fellowship; no formal complaint was filed.; He mentions a 2008 convention incident where a student allegedly asked him to join a hot tub and later accused him of harassment.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Lawrence Kraus denies sexual harassment allegations in email to BuzzFeed reporter

Lawrence Kraus denies sexual harassment allegations in email to BuzzFeed reporter The email provides a direct response from a senior academic (Lawrence Kraus) to media inquiries about multiple alleged harassment incidents, naming specific alleged incidents, dates, and parties (e.g., a 2006 hotel encounter, a student interested in science communication). While it does not contain new evidence, it offers concrete leads—names of alleged complainants, institutions, and a possible CFI affiliation—that could be followed up for verification, making it moderately useful for an investigation. Key insights: Kraus claims all allegations are false or distorted and offers detailed rebuttals to six listed items.; Item 1: alleged consensual hotel encounter in 2006 that did not progress.; Item 2: interaction with a female student interested in science communication, noting gender‑specific advice.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed News investigation into multiple sexual misconduct allegations against physicist Lawrence Krauss

The document contains detailed allegations spanning a decade, specific incidents, dates, university investigations, and mentions of high‑profile institutions (ASU, ANU, Case Western, Center for Inquir Six distinct alleged incidents (2006‑2016) involving alleged sexual assault or harassment. University investigations at Case Western, Arizona State, and Australian National University conclud BuzzFee

14p
House OversightUnknown

BuzzFeed investigation and Lawrence Krauss' response to multiple sexual misconduct allegations (2006‑2016)

BuzzFeed investigation and Lawrence Krauss' response to multiple sexual misconduct allegations (2006‑2016) The document provides a detailed chronology of alleged incidents, university investigations, and Krauss' own rebuttal, offering concrete dates, institutions, and specific complaints that could be followed up for verification. While the allegations are already public, the email chain contains references to internal university communications and investigative outcomes that are not widely reported, making it a moderate‑value lead for further fact‑checking and potential exposure of institutional handling. Key insights: Six specific alleged incidents spanning 2006‑2016 with dates, locations, and parties named.; University investigations at Case Western, Arizona State University, and Australian National University referenced, with outcomes described as “unsubstantiated”.; BuzzFeed reporter Peter Aldhous seeks Krauss’ evidence for claims that universities concluded the reports were fabricated.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.