Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-33526House OversightOther

House Oversight Hearing Transcript Excerpts on Striking Pleadings

The passage is a routine procedural discussion about striking pleadings in a legal context, mentioning only a generic lawyer and Professor Dershowitz. It provides no concrete allegations, financial fl Witness confirms courts generally disfavor motions to strike pleadings. Witness acknowledges that striking allegations is a drastic remedy. Reference to Professor Dershowitz's application to interven

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021829
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a routine procedural discussion about striking pleadings in a legal context, mentioning only a generic lawyer and Professor Dershowitz. It provides no concrete allegations, financial fl Witness confirms courts generally disfavor motions to strike pleadings. Witness acknowledges that striking allegations is a drastic remedy. Reference to Professor Dershowitz's application to interven

Tags

oversight-hearinglegal-procedurehouse-oversightcourt-practice

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — Q. Okay. But other than referring the two parties to the Bar, you never entered, to your recollection, striking a party's pleadings; is that right? A. That's right. Q. Okay. I want to ask you a few questions about the issue of striking pleadings. Would you agree with me that courts generally disfavor a motion to strike? A. No. Q. And that striking allegations from a pleading is a drastic remedy to be resorted to only when required for the purposes of justice and only when the allegations to be stricken have no possible relation to the controversy? A. I think that's what some courts have said, yes. Q. And is it fair to say -- is that what you represented to the court in response to Professor Dershowitz's application to intervene? A. That's right. Q. And you wouldn't have represented that to the court unless you believed it to be accurate; is that right? A. That's right. ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferring

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.