Defense Claims DOJ Official Misrepresented Deferred Prosecution Agreement Modifications in Epstein Case
Summary
The passage outlines a dispute over a purported modification to Jeffrey Epstein's Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) by U.S. Attorney Paul Acosta and SDFL prosecutor Michael Sloman. It suggests poss Sloman threatened to terminate the DPA unless Epstein complied with a 'unilateral modification' that The defense asserts the December 19, 2007 letter from U.S. Attorney Acosta only proposed changes,
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Internal memo discusses federal prosecution strategy for Jeffrey Epstein and applicability of the petite policy
The document reveals that a U.S. Attorney's Office is evaluating whether to pursue federal charges against Jeffrey Epstein despite state proceedings, indicating potential high‑level prosecutorial deci Memo evaluates federal jurisdiction over commercial sexual exploitation of children in Epstein case. Discusses the 'petite policy' and its inapplicability due to overlapping state charges. Mentions t
Letter from Kirkland & Ellis urging a de novo federal review of Jeffrey Epstein prosecution
The passage reveals internal legal strategy to challenge a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, cites a non‑prosecution agreement, and mentions a subpoena issued by Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafan Kirkland & Ellis argues the Department's prior review was limited and not de novo. Reference to a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that should have precluded further federal action. Assistant U.S. Att
Law firms request DOJ oversight of Jeffrey Epstein case, citing alleged prosecutor misconduct
The document reveals a formal request by high‑profile lawyers (Kenneth Starr, former independent counsel) to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip for a review of federal involvement in the Jeffrey Epste Letter dated May 19 2008 from Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to Deputy AG Mark Filip requesting DOJ r Allegations that U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta limited a Criminal Division review and that federal pro
Prosecutors Misrepresented Victim Count and Confidentiality in Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement
The passage details alleged prosecutorial misconduct—inflated victim numbers, false assurances of confidentiality, and internal emails involving U.S. Attorney Alejandro Acosta, Deputy U.S. Attorney An AUSA Villafana claimed 40 minor victims in September 2007, later reduced to 34 confirmed minors plus Villafana communicated directly with senior officials (Acosta, Lourie, Garcia) about keeping the N
Local report alleges sealed deal allowed Jeffrey Epstein to avoid federal prosecution, citing involvement of high‑profile lawyers and possible pros...
The passage mentions a sealed agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, names prominent legal figures (Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, former NACL president), and suggests a back‑room deal Sealed agreement reportedly allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution in exchange for a plea to s Attorney Michael McCabe (now securities litigator) comments on the rarity of the procedure. High‑p
Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Federal Jeffrey Epstein Case
The passage alleges that senior U.S. Attorney Office staff (AUSA Weinstein, FAUSA Sloman, U.S. Attorney Acosta) disclosed case‑specific information and possibly offered financial inducements to witnes AUSA Weinstein allegedly disclosed plea‑negotiation details and warned a defense‑contact about media FAUSA Sloman reportedly sent non‑case‑specific information to defense, contradicting internal poli
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.