Procedural dispute over plaintiff standing and amendment in CVRA case
Summary
The passage discusses routine litigation procedural issues—whether additional anonymous plaintiffs (Jane Doe 3 and 4) should be added and standing under the CVRA. It mentions no high‑profile individua Petitioners argue Jane Doe 3 and 4 need not be listed as parties for the case to proceed. Government claims Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was unknown when the non‑prosecution agreeme Court ha
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court denies amendment to add additional Jane Doe plaintiffs in CVRA case
The passage discusses procedural arguments about adding parties to a civil rights case and does not reveal any new allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no Petitioners seek to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as parties but the court finds it unnecessary. Government argues Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was not known when a non‑prosecution agreeme T
Anonymous lawsuit alleging sexual assault by Trump raises questions about plaintiff’s identity and attorney involvement
The passage mentions a new lawsuit against Donald Trump with a plaintiff using multiple aliases and attorneys who have political donation histories. While it provides some concrete details (names of l Plaintiff uses multiple aliases (Jane Doe, Katie Johnson) and a blurred video. Attorneys: Mason (unknown first name) and Thomas Meagher, a New Jersey patent litigator. Mason donated $2,000 to Hillary
Jane Doe plaintiffs allege secret non‑prosecution agreement between U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein
The passage hints at a concealed government‑Epstein agreement (an NPA) that could be a significant investigative lead, but provides no concrete details—no dates, officials, or transaction data—making Four Jane Doe plaintiffs claim the government executed a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with The alleged NPA was allegedly concealed from victims and is the basis of the lawsuit. The plaintif
Civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe’s father alleging tortious conduct and seeking loss of consortium damages
The document is a standard complaint in a personal injury case with no mention of high‑profile individuals, government agencies, or financial transactions. It provides only basic procedural details (p Filed on January 2008 by Herman & Mermelstein law firm in Miami, FL Plaintiff: Jane Doe’s father, seeking loss of consortium damages Demand for a jury trial
Court hearing reveals undocumented Epstein trash‑message evidence and missing record custodians
The passage hints at undisclosed documents allegedly containing Jeffrey Epstein‑related communications that lack a record custodian and were possibly obtained through an unknown source (Mr. Edwards). Plaintiffs claim to have phone messages and photocopies from Epstein's trash. No DOJ witness or record custodian is listed for these documents. Defense argues the evidence cannot be admitted due to l
Plaintiffs allege Saudi princes and Kingdom aided 9/11 via charitable support, raising FSIA jurisdiction questions
The passage outlines a novel legal theory linking Saudi royalty and the Saudi government to the 9/11 attacks through alleged material support via charities. While it does not provide concrete financia Claims that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, on behalf of Saudi Arabia, aided al Qaeda through charit Argument that the FSIA terrorism exception (§1605(a)(7)) should apply despite the alleged support
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.