Skip to content
Case File
d-33956House OversightOther

Linda Stone emails Jeffrey Epstein discussing potential cabinet role and Trump appeal

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #030639
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The email suggests a direct conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and a contact (Linda Stone) about political influence, including a possible cabinet position and commentary on Trump’s appeal. While th Epstein is being asked about the likelihood of 'winning' (implying political or legal outcomes). Linda Stone asks if Epstein will have a cabinet position, hinting at possible political patronage. Dis

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinpotential-patronagepotential-misconductpolitical-influencecabinet-appointmentmoderate-importancetrumphouse-oversightfinancial-context
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Linda Stone emails Jeffrey Epstein discussing Trump, Clinton, and potential cabinet role

The passage contains speculative commentary about political figures and a vague question about a future cabinet position, but provides no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It h Mentions a hypnotic effect of an unnamed individual on the masses. References "Clinton is charisma‑compromised" in a political context. Speculates that widespread antidepressant/ADHD drug use may mak

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Linda Stone emails Jeffrey Epstein discussing potential cabinet role and Trump appeal

The passage contains a casual email exchange with no concrete details, dates, or transactions. It merely hints at a possible future cabinet position and vague speculation about Trump’s popularity, off Email from Linda Stone to Jeffrey Epstein dated Sep 25‑26, 2016 Mentions “Will you have a cabinet position?” directed at Epstein Speculates that widespread antidepressant/ADHD drug use may affect Tru

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Linda Stone emails Jeffrey Epstein discussing Trump, Clinton, and vague tech ideas

The passage contains only speculative, non‑specific commentary about political figures and personal projects. It lacks concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads, offering minimal invest Mentions a perceived ‘hypnotic’ effect of an unnamed individual on the masses. References ‘Clinton is charisma‑compromised’ without detail. Speculates that widespread antidepressant/ADHD drug use may

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein email referencing Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation education grants and a pending meeting in December

The passage hints at a possible coordination between the Gates Foundation, the Obama administration's education agenda, and an undisclosed party represented by Epstein. However, it provides no concret Epstein mentions a representative arriving in the second week of December (2009). Reference to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's $200 million annual education grants. Linking Gates Foundation educati

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein email referencing Vanity Fair article and alleged ties to Ghislaine Maxwell, Bill/Melinda Gates, and high‑profile financiers

The passage contains a direct email from Epstein to a contact discussing a Vanity Fair profile that links him to Ghislaine Maxwell, Bill and Melinda Gates, and financiers such as Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexn Epstein forwards a Vanity Fair link titled “Notes on New York’s Oddest Alliance” dated March 8 2011. The email mentions Bill and Melinda Gates as a possible story angle for reconstruction projects in

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Linda Stone email to Jeffrey Epstein mentioning Trump headlines

The passage provides a vague, unsubstantiated reference to Trump in a casual email to Epstein with no specifics, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It hints at a possible connection but lacks Email dated 10/8/2016 from Linda Stone to Jeffrey Epstein. Mentions "Trump is owning the headlines this weekend" without detail. Sent with high importance flag, suggesting perceived relevance to the

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.