Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-33988House Oversight

Legal commentary on the Schenck v. United States “shouting fire” analogy

Other

The passage is a historical and doctrinal analysis of a Supreme Court case with no new factual allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving current officials or entities. Discusses the origin of the “shouting fire in a theater” analogy from Justice Holmes. Describes Charles Schenck’s 1917 anti‑draft pamphlet and its legal context. Emphasizes the difference between political pers

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017177
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.