Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34092House OversightDeposition

Testimony claims Alan Dershowitz received adult massages at Jeffrey Epstein’s home, but no allegation of illegal activity

The passage repeats already‑public claims about Dershowitz’s visits to Epstein’s residence and adult massages, explicitly stating there is no evidence of wrongdoing or under‑age contact. It offers no Alessi testified that Alan Dershowitz visited Epstein’s house and received a massage. The massage was performed by a professional adult therapist, not an under‑age individual. No allegations of illeg

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010748
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage repeats already‑public claims about Dershowitz’s visits to Epstein’s residence and adult massages, explicitly stating there is no evidence of wrongdoing or under‑age contact. It offers no Alessi testified that Alan Dershowitz visited Epstein’s house and received a massage. The massage was performed by a professional adult therapist, not an under‑age individual. No allegations of illeg

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinsexual-misconduct-allegationalan-dershowitzlegal-exposuresexual-misconduct-allegationshouse-oversightmassagecourt-testimony

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 14 of 19 “Alessi Depo. Tr.”) Alessi testified that he saw “many celebrities” at the house... [including] a very famous lawyer[] that I’m sure you know, Alan Dershowitz, who spend [sic] at the house a couple times.” (Alessi Depo. Tr. 70, 71.) However, Alessi made no allegations of improprieties against any of these individuals. Jane Doe #3 asks the Court to infer that because Prof. Dershowitz was at his client’s home, he must have participated in nefarious activities. In fact, Prof. Dershowitz’s friendship with Epstein consisted of the exchange of academic and intellectual ideas. At most, Alessi testified that Prof. Dershowitz visited Epstein’s home and received a massage from an adult massage therapist, which “was a treat for everybody” at the Epstein home. (Id. at 74) (“Q. Did [Dershowitz] have massages sometimes when he was there? A. Yes. A massage was like a treat for everybody. If they want it, we call the massage and they have a massage.”) Alessi explains that he was referring to massages performed by adult massage therapists. (Id. at 184) (“Q. All right. And if I understood your testimony is, the ones the — that is, of the massage therapists as you’ve just described [a hundred, 200 different massage therapists], you saw some men? A. Yes. Q. You saw more women? A. Yes. Q. And all of the women, at least from your viewpoint, were 18, 19 or older? A. Yes.”)’ Messrs. Alessi and Rodriguez did not allege that Prof. Dershowitz received a massage from any underage females, had any physical contact whatsoever with any underage females, or witnessed anyone engaging in any inappropriate behavior with any underage females. Additionally, despite their allegations to the contrary, it is clear that previous testimony from Rodriguez and Alessi does not corroborate Jane Doe #3’s baseless and utterly false affidavit. (DE 291-1.) ’TIn fact, the only massage Prof. Dershowitz ever received at any of Epstein’s homes was from a professional massage therapist who was in her 30’s or 40s. 14

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM
Wire Refreferring

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alan Dershowitz defends representing Mike Tyson amid campus backlash

The passage only recounts public criticism and debate over Dershowitz's representation of Mike Tyson, without revealing new facts, financial transactions, or links to powerful officials. It offers lit Dershowitz faced letters and attacks for defending Tyson on appeal. Students threatened sexual harassment complaints over his classroom discussions. The controversy centers on the ethical debate of r

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Draft transcript excerpt mentions Jeffrey Epstein invoking the Fifth and a reference to Alan Dershowitz

The passage provides a vague, uncited reference to Epstein and Dershowitz refusing to answer questions in a hearing. It lacks concrete details—no dates, transactions, or specific allegations—making it Jeffrey Epstein allegedly took the Fifth Amendment during a court hearing. A question about Alan Dershowitz was raised, and he also invoked the Fifth. The excerpt is labeled as a rough draft and appe

1p
House OversightUnknown

Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit

Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit The passage outlines a procedural battle over production of documents and metadata in a defamation case involving Alan Dershowitz. While it flags potential evidence that could expose communications or internal materials, it lacks concrete details about the content, dates, or parties beyond the litigants, limiting immediate investigative value. However, the mention of “control” and alleged refusal to produce metadata could merit follow‑up to determine what information is being withheld and whether it relates to broader controversies surrounding Dershowitz. Key insights: Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz is withholding documents and metadata under the claim of ‘control’.; The objection is framed as ‘word play’ and gamesmanship, suggesting possible intentional concealment.; Discovery objections focus on timeframe limits, implying plaintiffs seek records spanning an undefined period.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Lesley Groff

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Lesley Groff <MIEll

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.