Skip to content
Case File
d-34168House OversightOther

Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta knew about prior rebuke of Epstein case prosecutor A. Marie Villafana

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021750
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The passage reveals that Alexander Acosta, then Miami U.S. Attorney and later U.S. Labor Secretary, was aware of a federal judge’s rebuke of his subordinate prosecutor for concealing victim informatio Acosta was notified in 2007 that prosecutor A. Marie Villafana concealed victim information in a sep A federal judge rebuked Villafana in January 2007 for an "intentional and/or serious lapse in judg

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

alexander-acostajeffrey-epsteinsex-traffickingprosecutorial-misconductus-attorneyfinancial-flow-potentially-linpolitical-influencejudicial-rebukelegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta allegedly knew of a prosecutor's concealment of victim info in a prior child sex case before the Epstein plea ...

The passage links a senior Justice Department official (Alexander Acosta) to a prior misconduct by a subordinate prosecutor that was concealed, suggesting a pattern of handling sexual abuse cases that Acosta was notified in 2007 that prosecutor A. Marie Villafafa concealed victim information in a Tex A federal judge rebuked Villafafa for “intentional and/or serious lapse in judgment.” Acosta defen

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal

The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Non‑Prosecution Agreement signed by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta for Jeffrey Epstein

The passage merely confirms the existence of a standard non‑prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein, signed by known officials (U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Vi Agreement signed by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana also signs Counsel for Epstein listed as Lilly Ann Sanchez

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Signature page of Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement signed by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and staff

The document confirms that a senior U.S. Attorney (Alexander Acosta) formally executed a non‑prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein, providing a concrete point of contact and legal framework that c Agreement signed by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, indicating high‑level DOJ involvement. Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafana also listed, suggesting staff participation. Counsel for Epstein (Ge

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

President Trump named as witness in lawsuit over federal prosecutors' handling of Jeffrey Epstein accusations

The passage links the President, a nominee for Labor Secretary, and former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta to a lawsuit concerning the Epstein case, suggesting possible misconduct by high‑level officia Trump is identified as a witness in a lawsuit about how prosecutors handled Epstein allegations. Alexander Acosta, former U.S. attorney and Trump’s Labor Secretary nominee, is mentioned as part of T

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Former top Epstein prosecutor defends Alexander Acosta amid calls for probe of 2008 plea deal

The passage provides a named insider (Jeffrey H. Sloman) who was second‑in‑command at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami and is publicly defending Alexander Acosta’s 2008 non‑prosecution agreement wi Jeffrey H. Sloman, former second‑in‑command at the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, publicly defends Ac Sloman cites "legal impediments" and internal debate as reasons for the deal, suggesting possible

2p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.