Roy Black email referencing Trump story and Epstein without substantive detailsYou both are interesting; you let us see what's to become of the Scalia 35 (see below; at bottom,
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Letter questioning federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and citing DOJ/USAO discretion
Title Matchkaggle-ho-012188
Case Filed-34212House OversightLetter questioning federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and citing DOJ/USAO discretion
November 11, 20251p1 persons
Case File
d-34212House OversightLetter questioning federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and citing DOJ/USAO discretion
Other
The passage outlines a legal argument against a federal child‑exploitation case against Jeffrey Epstein, mentioning DOJ officials, the USAO, and a private counsel (CEOS). It provides no new factual al Claims that the DOJ/USAO’s federal prosecution of Epstein is improper without full factual review References to a private counsel (CEOS) reviewing the case and advising against federal charges Cites
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012188
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.