Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34391House OversightFBI Report

Palm Beach prosecutor’s referral of Epstein case to grand jury and subsequent FBI investigation

The passage reveals that a state prosecutor (Krischer) diverted a probable‑cause case against Jeffrey Epstein to a grand jury, limited witness testimony, and that the chief prosecutor (Reiter) escalat May 2006: Prosecutor Recarey prepared probable‑cause affidavits against Epstein and associates. Krischer referred the case to a state grand jury, allegedly dismissing accusers. Only two of more than

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #016443
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals that a state prosecutor (Krischer) diverted a probable‑cause case against Jeffrey Epstein to a grand jury, limited witness testimony, and that the chief prosecutor (Reiter) escalat May 2006: Prosecutor Recarey prepared probable‑cause affidavits against Epstein and associates. Krischer referred the case to a state grand jury, allegedly dismissing accusers. Only two of more than

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinsexual-abuse-litigationpalm-beach-countyprosecution-misconductlaw-enforcement-investigationfbi-investigationlegal-exposurehouse-oversightgrand-juryprocedural-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
In May 2006, Recarey drew up probable cause affidavits, charging Epstein, two of his assistants and one recruiter with sex-related crimes. Instead, Krischer took what Recarey said was the unusual step of referring the case to a state grand jury. Epstein was indicted in state court on a minor charge of solicitation of prostitution. Recarey said Krischer told him he didn’t believe Epstein’s accusers, and only two of them were called before the state grand jury investigating the case — even though police had lined up more than a dozen girls and witnesses at that time. Believing that the case had been tainted, Reiter — that same month, May 2006 — took a very public stance against Krischer, writing a letter, which was released to the news media, calling on Krischer to remove himself from the case. The chief then referred it to the FBI, which opened its own investigation in July 2006, FBI records show. Reiter said he was effectively blackballed in some Palm Beach circles as a result of going over Krischer’s head, and their relationship, once strong, would never be the same. Reiter has no regrets about what he did. “There are challenges here that don’t exist in a lot of other places because of the affluence in the community, but the only way I could approach this case was that none of that matters. The truth is still the truth. The facts are the facts. Everybody is treated the same.” In the years that followed, several of the victims obtained lawyers and filed civil lawsuits against Epstein. About two dozen lawsuits were filed, starting in 2008. The early cases were particularly brutal for his victims, the court records show. The girls faced fierce grilling from another pack of Epstein’s civil attorneys, who questioned them about their boyfriends, drinking, drug use, social media posts, their parents and even their medical histories. One girl was asked about her abortions, and her parents, who were Catholic and knew nothing about the abortions, were also deposed and questioned.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferring

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.