Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34506House OversightOther

Axios article on potential recession pressure on Big Tech cited in House Oversight email

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #033420
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely forwards a publicly available news article summarizing generic economic and regulatory concerns about major tech firms. It contains no new allegations, specific transactions, or und Mentions possible congressional testimony by Google, Twitter, and Facebook CEOs in 2018. Notes President Trump's interest in investigating monopolistic behavior of Big Tech. References ongoing FTC in

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

regulatory-riskeconomyregulationpolitical-scrutinycongressional-testimonybig-techhouse-oversightantitrust
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: 12/4/2018 3:20:07 PM To: jeeyacation@gmail.com Subject: Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech - Axios Importance: High What do we think of this? https://www.axios.com/recession-threat-2019-regulatory-risk-google-facebook-amazon-b8966b22-57dc-426c- 9f4f-5526982383c7.html Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech Sara Fischer, David McCabe, Courtenay Brown5 hours ago A potential recession, combined with increasing regulatory threats for some of the biggest tech companies, foreshadows a difficult 2019 for Silicon Valley. Why it matters: The biggest tech companies have already raked in billions of dollars in profits and benefited from major tax cuts that aren't going to be repeated, so next year isn't likely to be better for them financially. They've also been dogged by scandals that have left many questioning their positive role in society, and if on top of that the economy starts to slip, 2019 could be worse. "People look for scapegoats in a bad economy. And with big tech already on its heels, a downturn probably would feed arguments that the largest internet companies are too big and need to be reined in." — Paul Gallant, an analyst with Cowen Washington Research Group Big Tech is closing out a contentious year in Washington, and potential regulation will continue to haunt it well into 2019. • Google CEO Sundar Pichai has agreed to testify before Congress, and will likely be asked about whether the company is being transparent about its data privacy practices and any potential bias. By the year's end, the CEOs of Twitter, Google and Facebook will have been called to testified in front of Congress for the first time ever during 2018. • Lawmakers in the United States are pushing for a federal privacy law with an urgency likely to be exacerbated by more breaches like the one Marriott disclosed last Friday. • The Federal Trade Commission still has an open investigation into whether Facebook's conduct violated a previous settlement with the agency. Margrethe Vestager, Europe's aggressive commissioner overseeing competition, is still investigating aspects of Google's business and whether Amazon plays fair in the market for generic products. • President Trump has said his administration is seriously looking into monopolistic behavior of Facebook, Google and Amazon. Some analysts predict an economic slowdown___even if it doesn't lead to a recession like the one in 2008___will be enough to change the global attitude around big American companies. "So the really shocking thing this year is that the only major economy in the world where growth has actually accelerated this year is America. And this is because of the tax cuts, the deregulation, the other stimulus which has been put into work. And that has also helped the earnings of companies. My point is, from next year onwards, those effects begin to fade." — Ruchir Sharma, chief global strategist at Morgan Stanley on Fareed Zakaria GPS on Sunday The "FAANG" stocks (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google) that pushed the stock market to record highs have not been immune from this year's market rout. • "The mood has changed. Investors are asking a lot more questions right now," says Larry Glazer, a Managing Partner at Mayflower Advisors, which manages $3 billion. "Momentum has faded on these names." • Adding to potential concern: possible regulatory action could translate into higher costs, particularly for Google or Facebook. • "Facebook has been under such a dark cloud for so long that now everybody is expecting the worst," Paul Meeks, a technology portfolio manager at Wireless Fund, told Amos. The other side: "I don't see a looming recession. And even if there was, people aren't going to target these companies if there is a recession," says Nicholas Economides, Professor of Economics at NYU Stem School of Business. • Economides argues that, even if there was a mild reduction in GDP growth, it wouldn't significantly impact the high tech sector. • For companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter, "their main revenue streams are from ads. They gain market share from brands converting traditional ad spend to digital ads. This conversion is not so dependent on the growth of GDP, because they are still in the process of converting ads of different formats to digital ads, and that's something that will continue, regardless of GDP growth." The bottom line: Tech companies that have long been the darlings of investor portfolios will likely find themselves in much weaker positions.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler Leads Latham & Watkins Defense of Emirates NBD in $½B Trade‑Secret Lawsuit

The passage links a high‑profile former Obama administration official to a major UAE sovereign‑wealth‑backed bank in a multi‑hundred‑million‑dollar trade‑secret case. It provides specific names, dates Kathryn Ruemmler, former White House counsel, appeared as lead counsel for Emirates NBD in a $554‑mi The case centered on alleged theft of a mobile‑payment platform (SpanCash) from entrepreneur Faroo

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in Doe v. Trump (1:16-cv-07673-RA)

The passage merely confirms that a case against Trump was voluntarily dismissed, providing no details on allegations, parties, financial flows, or misconduct. It offers a minimal lead—identifying a la Case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA filed in Southern District of New York Plaintiff listed as Jane Doe Case was voluntarily dismissed on Nov 4, 2016

1p
House OversightIndictmentNov 11, 2025

Lawfare article notes lack of definitive OLC ban on indicting a sitting president

The passage summarizes existing Office of Legal Counsel memos and court history, highlighting that there is no clear, binding policy against indicting a sitting president. It does not introduce new ac Six historical OLC memos and briefs have addressed presidential indictment, showing no consistent po 1973 OLC memo was effectively repudiated by the Justice Department in United States v. Nixon. 2000

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Manuscript excerpts alleging internal chaos, legal pressure, and possible financial improprieties in the Trump White House

The passage provides a narrative of alleged internal conflicts, lawyer‑client dynamics, and speculative financial schemes (e.g., the Trump‑Epstein Palm Beach house deal, Kushner‑Apollo financing) that Alleged $55 million profit for Trump on a Palm Beach house purchased via Deutsche Bank financing and Kushner’s $184 million financing from Apollo Global Management and the suggestion that the Souther

47p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Voluntary dismissal filing in Doe v. Trump (SDNY) case 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA

The passage only confirms that a plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal in a lawsuit against Donald Trump and others. It provides no details on allegations, evidence, financial flows, or involvement of Electronic filing notice from SDNY on 11/4/2016 Case number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA, titled Doe v. Trump et al Plaintiff (Jane Doe) voluntarily dismissed the action

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Voluntary Dismissal Filing in Doe v. Trump (1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA)

The email documents a routine voluntary dismissal of a case against Donald Trump and others, providing no new factual allegations, financial details, or evidence of wrongdoing. It merely confirms that Case was filed in the Southern District of New York under number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA. Plaintiff listed as Jane Doe, indicating a possibly anonymous or protected claimant. The filing was entered by attor

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.