Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34549House OversightDeposition

Epstein’s deposition shows he invoked the Fifth on questions linking him to high‑profile figures and underage sexual activity

The passage lists multiple Fifth‑Amendment refusals by Jeffrey Epstein when asked about socializing with Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former New Mexico gove Epstein refused to answer whether he was with Donald Trump around under‑18 females. He also declined to answer about Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former N He invoked the

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013358
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage lists multiple Fifth‑Amendment refusals by Jeffrey Epstein when asked about socializing with Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former New Mexico gove Epstein refused to answer whether he was with Donald Trump around under‑18 females. He also declined to answer about Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former N He invoked the

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinnew-mexico-governorfinancial-flow-implied-via-stadavid-copperfielddonald-trumpforeign-influencesexual-abusefifth-amendmentalan-dershowitzlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightmichael-mottolasexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
105. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have you ever socialized-with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Jd. at : 106. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz im the — of females under the age of 18.” Jd. at : 107. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have +i ever socialized with Mr. Mottola in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Jd. at 91- 108. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Did you ever socialize with David Copperfield in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Jd. at 109. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have - ever socialized with Mr. Richardson [Governor of New Mexico and formerly USS. Representative and ‘Ambassador to the United Nations] in the presence of females under the age of 18.” Id. at 94. | 110. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have you ever sexually abused children?” Jd. at 95. 111. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Did you have staff members that assisted you in scheduling appointments with underage females; that is, females under the age of 18.” Jd. at 97-98. 112. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “On how many occasions did you solicit prostitution.” Jd. at 102. | 40

Related Documents (6)

House OversightJan 17, 2014

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

1p
House OversightNov 4, 2011

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Epstein’s Fifth‑Amendment Responses Implicate High‑Profile Figures in Underage Socializing Allegations

The passage lists multiple instances where Jeffrey Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about socializing with prominent individuals—including a former president, a high‑profile attorney, a Epstein refused to answer questions linking Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Mottola, David Copperfiel He also declined to answer direct questions about personal sexual abuse of children and solicitati

1p
House OversightUnknown

Epstein’s deposition shows he invoked the Fifth on questions linking him to high‑profile figures and underage sexual activity

Epstein’s deposition shows he invoked the Fifth on questions linking him to high‑profile figures and underage sexual activity The passage lists multiple Fifth‑Amendment refusals by Jeffrey Epstein when asked about socializing with Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former New Mexico governor/U.S. ambassador in the presence of minors. While the document does not provide direct evidence, the pattern of refusals suggests potential connections between Epstein and powerful individuals that merit further investigative follow‑up (e.g., subpoena records, interview witnesses, review of scheduling logs). The lead is moderately novel—specific deposition citations are not widely reported—and involves high‑profile actors, making it both sensitive and potentially controversial. Key insights: Epstein refused to answer whether he was with Donald Trump around under‑18 females.; He also declined to answer about Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former New Mexico governor/U.S. ambassador.; He invoked the Fifth on direct abuse allegations and on whether staff scheduled appointments with minors.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Epstein’s Fifth‑Amendment Responses Implicate High‑Profile Figures in Underage Socializing Allegations

Epstein’s Fifth‑Amendment Responses Implicate High‑Profile Figures in Underage Socializing Allegations The passage lists multiple instances where Jeffrey Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about socializing with prominent individuals—including a former president, a high‑profile attorney, a music executive, a magician, and a former governor/U.N. ambassador—in the presence of minors. The specificity of names and the context of alleged underage interaction provide concrete leads for further investigation (e.g., deposition transcripts, subpoenaable records). While the claims are unverified and the excerpt offers no direct evidence of wrongdoing, the involvement of powerful actors and the nature of the questions make the lead both controversial and potentially high‑impact if substantiated. Key insights: Epstein refused to answer questions linking Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former governor/U.N. ambassador to underage females.; He also declined to answer direct questions about personal sexual abuse of children and solicitation of prostitution.; The deposition citations (Jd. at 89‑102) provide precise references for locating the testimony.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...

The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema

39p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.