Nonsensical retail brand list with no actionable informationSteve Bannon discusses using a church front and cryptocurrency to shield fund flows and claim confession privilege in communications with Jeffrey E...
Case File
d-34616House OversightOtherEpstein Dismisses Claims Against Edwards Over Alleged Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Involvement
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013402
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The passage notes that Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards, alleging no factual basis for Edwards' involvement in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. While it mentions a high‑profile Epstein withdrew his claims against Edwards just before a summary judgment hearing. The allegations tied Edwards to Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme but were deemed unsupported. Epstein's dismissal of
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
jeffrey-epsteinfinancial-fraud-allegationcourt-filingponzi-schemescott-rothsteinlegal-exposurehouse-oversightlegal-dismissalsummary-judgment
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #013402
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages
judgment on basis of facts established without dispute). Where the nonmoving party fails to
present evidence rebutting the motion for summary judgment and there is no genuine issue of
material fact, then entry of judgment is proper as a matter of law. See Davis v. Hathaway, 408
So. 2d 688, 689 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1982); see also Holl, 191 So. 2d at 43. Faced with these
well-established legal principles, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards on
the eve of the hearing on Edwards Motion for Summary Judgment.
B. Epstein’s Claim Regarding Edwards Had Absolutely No Factual Basis.
~~ This was not a complicated case: for granting summary judgment: To. the contrary; ‘the
-=“umcontested record clearly established: that~each and“ everyone ofEpstein’s-claims against
Edwards lacked any merit whatsoever.'
I Epstein’s allegations regarding Edwards’ involvement in Rothstein’s “Ponzi
Scheme” were unsupported and unsupportable because Edwards was simply
' not involved in any such scheme.** -- ~ - : “
a. Edwards Had No Involvement in the Ponzi Scheme.
The bulk of Epstein’s claims against Edwards hinged on the premise that Edwards was
involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein. Broad allegations of wrongdoing on the part
of Edwards were scattered willy-nilly throughout the complaint. None of the allegations
provided any substance as to how Edwards actually assisted the Ponzi scheme, and allegations
that he “knew or should have known” of its existence are based upon an impermissible
pyramiding of inferences. In any event, these allegations all fail for one straightforward reason:
' The dismissal of Epstein’s claims against Edwards did not affect Epstein’s claims against Scott Rothstein. Epstein
had already chosen to dismiss all of his claims against L.M., the only other defendant named in the suit.
9
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.