Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34616House OversightOther

Epstein Dismisses Claims Against Edwards Over Alleged Rothstein Ponzi Scheme Involvement

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013402
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage notes that Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards, alleging no factual basis for Edwards' involvement in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. While it mentions a high‑profile Epstein withdrew his claims against Edwards just before a summary judgment hearing. The allegations tied Edwards to Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme but were deemed unsupported. Epstein's dismissal of

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinfinancial-fraud-allegationcourt-filingponzi-schemescott-rothsteinlegal-exposurehouse-oversightlegal-dismissalsummary-judgment
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages judgment on basis of facts established without dispute). Where the nonmoving party fails to present evidence rebutting the motion for summary judgment and there is no genuine issue of material fact, then entry of judgment is proper as a matter of law. See Davis v. Hathaway, 408 So. 2d 688, 689 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1982); see also Holl, 191 So. 2d at 43. Faced with these well-established legal principles, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards on the eve of the hearing on Edwards Motion for Summary Judgment. B. Epstein’s Claim Regarding Edwards Had Absolutely No Factual Basis. ~~ This was not a complicated case: for granting summary judgment: To. the contrary; ‘the -=“umcontested record clearly established: that~each and“ everyone ofEpstein’s-claims against Edwards lacked any merit whatsoever.' I Epstein’s allegations regarding Edwards’ involvement in Rothstein’s “Ponzi Scheme” were unsupported and unsupportable because Edwards was simply ' not involved in any such scheme.** -- ~ - : “ a. Edwards Had No Involvement in the Ponzi Scheme. The bulk of Epstein’s claims against Edwards hinged on the premise that Edwards was involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein. Broad allegations of wrongdoing on the part of Edwards were scattered willy-nilly throughout the complaint. None of the allegations provided any substance as to how Edwards actually assisted the Ponzi scheme, and allegations that he “knew or should have known” of its existence are based upon an impermissible pyramiding of inferences. In any event, these allegations all fail for one straightforward reason: ' The dismissal of Epstein’s claims against Edwards did not affect Epstein’s claims against Scott Rothstein. Epstein had already chosen to dismiss all of his claims against L.M., the only other defendant named in the suit. 9

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.