Skip to content
Case File
d-34630House OversightOther

Florida civil suit filed by model Jean‑Luc Brunel and MC2 Model & Talent Miami against Jeffrey Epstein and Tyler McDonald

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011912
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The complaint confirms that Jean‑Luc Brunel, a key figure in the Epstein‑related modeling network, is pursuing legal action against Jeffrey Epstein in Florida, providing a concrete filing date, docket Civil action filed in Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County, FL (Case No. 14‑21348 CA 01). Plaintiffs: Jean‑Luc Brunel (individual) and MC2 Model & Talent Miami, LLC. Defendants: Jeffrey Epstein, Ty

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

jeffrey-epsteincivil-complaintdefamationmodel-industryjeanluc-brunelcivil-litigationlegal-exposureflorida-courtshouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Civil Summons Served on Jeffrey Epstein and Associates in Miami-Dade County

The document is a standard civil summons notifying Jeffrey Epstein, Jean‑Luc Brunel, and Tyler McDonald of a lawsuit. While it confirms legal action against high‑profile individuals, the filing provid Summons issued by Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, Miami‑Dade County, Florida. Defendants include Jeffrey Epstein, Jean‑Luc Brunel, and Tyler McDonald (doing business as YLORG). Plaintiff’s attorney

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Plaintiff claims emotional distress from alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse; lawsuit also targets website owner Tyler McDonald for defamatory hyperlinks

The passage provides a civil complaint alleging personal harm from Jeffrey Epstein and a separate defamation claim against a small‑scale website operator. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, financ Plaintiff Brunel alleges emotional and business harm from alleged sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. Claims include psychotherapy treatment and medication use. Defendant Tyler McDonald operates Yi.Org,

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Plaintiff Brunel claims visa delays and business losses due to false association with Jeffrey Epstein

The passage provides a plaintiff's allegation that his visa and revenue were harmed by a mischaracterized link to Jeffrey Epstein. It mentions no concrete evidence, specific transactions, or high‑rank Brunel alleges he has "clean hands" and was not involved in Epstein's sex trafficking. Claims visa application delays were caused by the false association with Epstein. States his MC2 modeling busine

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Doe v. Trump et al – Civil docket filing for assault, libel & slander case

The document is a routine docket entry showing that a plaintiff filed a civil suit against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, evidence, financial transactions Case filed on 06/20/2016 in SDNY, assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Plaintiff uses the pseudonym Jane Doe; represented by Thomas F. Meagher. Defendants listed: Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe alleging assault, libel and slander against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

The docket entry confirms a formal complaint linking Trump and Epstein to alleged assault and defamation, providing a concrete legal filing that could be a starting point for further investigation. Ho Complaint filed on 06/20/2016 in SDNY (Case #1:16‑cv‑04642‑RA) Plaintiff uses pseudonym "Jane Doe" and is represented by Thomas F. Meagher Defendants include Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.