Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-35136House OversightOther

Fragmented court transcript with vague references to motions and alleged sexual misconduct

The passage consists of disjointed, largely unintelligible courtroom dialogue with no specific names, dates, transactions, or concrete allegations that could be pursued. It lacks identifiable high‑pro Mentions a motion and a request for notice in a court setting. Reference to alleged sexual misconduct involving a minor victim, but no names or details. Court appears to be a Southern District court,

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011457
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage consists of disjointed, largely unintelligible courtroom dialogue with no specific names, dates, transactions, or concrete allegations that could be pursued. It lacks identifiable high‑pro Mentions a motion and a request for notice in a court setting. Reference to alleged sexual misconduct involving a minor victim, but no names or details. Court appears to be a Southern District court,

Tags

court-transcriptsexual-misconduct-allegationlegal-exposurehouse-oversightlegal-proceedingssexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3VOGIU3 motions that, put off until another day, THI my ah MS. particular, THI = aa = Explain to me MS. THI Gl they have to MS. this motion this motion T , COURT: Yes. MENNING 154 ER: —- enmeshed with some of the other based on plaintiff's representation, they want to COURT: how that figures in so I'm happy to wait. How does that so -- until the 15 days before, in figure —- I'm sorry. Eo the == motion? Well, these are the things about which MENNINGER: Into this COURT : give notice. MENNINGER: Exactly, your Honor. The issue in and I'll try to be slightly circumspect, but in we have agreed that our client can be cross examined with respect to plaintiff, any of plaintiff's allegations, client plaint with respect to any other minor victim. Our t has absolutely denied having been involved sexually with tiff or with the minor victim. They would like to introduce evidence of some kind every other acts with other peopl They have not yet what other acts and what should -- should wait until we get it that. E PORTERS, P.C. 0300 specified, apparently, completely, other people they're talking about. THE COURT: So I think we MS. MENNINGER: Right. THE COURT: So I think we all. Okay. So that takes care of SOUTHERN DISTRICT R (212) 805-

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.