Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-35221House OversightOther

Jane Doe lawsuit alleges Jeffrey Epstein caused intentional emotional distress and loss of parental consortium

The passage provides a civil complaint alleging personal harm caused by Jeffrey Epstein, offering concrete claims (emotional distress, loss of consortium) and named parties (Jane Doe, her father, step Plaintiffs: Jane Doe, her father (guardian), and stepmother. Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein. Claims: Intentional infliction of emotional distress and loss of parental consortium.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012641
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a civil complaint alleging personal harm caused by Jeffrey Epstein, offering concrete claims (emotional distress, loss of consortium) and named parties (Jane Doe, her father, step Plaintiffs: Jane Doe, her father (guardian), and stepmother. Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein. Claims: Intentional infliction of emotional distress and loss of parental consortium.

Tags

civil-lawsuitjeffrey-epsteinpersonal-injurytort-claimscivil-litigationlegal-exposurehouse-oversightemotional-distressparental-consortium

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
COUNT fi Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 21. Plaintiffs Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, Jane Doe’s Father and Jane Doe’s Stepmother, individually, repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 16 above, . 22. Epstein’s conduct was intentional or reckless. 23. Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency. 24. _Epstein’s conduct caused severe emotional distress not only to Jane Doe, but also to her parents, Jane Doe’s Father and Jane Doe’s Stepmother. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe’s parents. 25. Asa direct and proximate result of Epstein’s intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, Jane Does’ Father and Jane Doe’s Stepmother have suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, Jane Doe’s Father and Jane Doe’s Stepmother demand judgment against Defendant J effrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. . COUNT It Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe’s Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 27, Epstein’s tortious conduct is the direct and proximate cause of damages to Jane Doe’s Father, consisting of parental loss of comfort, companionship and society and healthcare costs HERMAN & MERMELSTEN, P. A, www.hermaniaw.com

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.hermaniaw.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01308033

23p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Memorandum and Order: 20cv00484 (JGK) (DF)

The document is a Memorandum and Order from U.S. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman granting Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay the civil proceedings against her and others pending the resolution of her criminal trial. Maxwell is currently in custody awaiting trial on July 12, 2021. The civil case involves allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation against Maxwell and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02726140

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

JANE DOE I JEFFREY EPSTEIN LITIGATION

JANE DOE I JEFFREY EPSTEIN LITIGATION RELEVANT PLEADINGS Docket No. Date Description 12 6/20/08 Defendant's Motion to Stay 13 6/20/08 Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer 16 7/1/08 Defendant's Notice Concerning Motion to Stay 23 7/17/08 Defendant's Motion to File Ex Parte and Under Seal 24 7/17/08 Defendant's "Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action" 31 7/29/08 Defendant's Notice of Filing Exhibits (Attaching Villafaiia Declaration from victims' rights suit) 33 8/5/08 Order Denying Motion to Stay 34 8/5/08 Order Denying Motion to Seal 37 8/12/08 Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal 38 8/12/08 Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Stay 40 9/4/08 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 41 9/22/08 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 45 9/30/08 Order Setting Trial Date and Discovery Deadlines 46 10/6/08 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Motion fo

2p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

511 922,419 FtIN;Cf

511 922,419 FtIN;Cf f ift - ( df)t— Th-tittsf e: wr iwi mcfn .3:95Kona - apt?? It * ci of * C PRCta MOSPats Details of a civil lawsuit, made public in January 2035, contained a deposition from "Jane Doe 3" that accused Maxwell of recruiting her in 1999, when she was a minor, and grooming her to provide sexual services for Epstein.M A 2018 expose by Julie K. Brown in the M' revealed Jane Doe 3 to be , who was previously known as met Maxwell at Donald 'frump's Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, w en was a 16- year-old spa attendant.M She asserted that Maxwell had introduced her to Epstein, after which she was " omed by. the two [of them] for his pleasure, including lessons in Epstein's preferences during oral sex". 22n631 Maxwell has repeatedly denied any involvement in Epstein's crimes.L2i In a 2015 statement, Maxwell rejected allegations that she has acted as a procurer for Epstein and denied that she had "facilitated Prince Andrew's [alleged] acts of sexual abus

25p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.