Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal and Victims’ CVRA Rights Challenge
Summary
The passage outlines a controversial non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein that involved high‑level officials (U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta) and raises legal questions under the Crime Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement after pressure on prosecutors, avoiding federal charges. Acosta, then U.S. Attorney, admitted a “year‑long assault on the prosecution” by Epstein. Victims
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Miami U.S. Attorney's Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case; DOJ Probe Targets Former Attorney Alexander Acosta
The passage identifies concrete actions (recusal, case reassignment to U.S. Attorney Byung J. "BJay" Pak, DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility investigation of Alexander Acosta) and names high‑pr Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in March 2019. Case reassigned to the Northern District of Georgia U.S. Attorney Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump appoi J
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal
The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail
Miami U.S. Attorney's Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case; DOJ Probe into Former Attorney Alexander Acosta
The passage identifies concrete actions—recusal of Miami prosecutors, reassignment to the Atlanta U.S. Attorney (Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump appointee), and an ongoing DOJ Office of Professional Resp Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in March 2019. Case reassigned to U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. "BJay" Pak, a Trump‑ J
Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal Involving U.S. Attorney’s Office and Potential Political Pressure
The passage details a controversial non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein that was allegedly influenced by pressure on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, referencing former Attorney General Ale Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement after pressure on prosecutors, avoiding federal charges. Former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta acknowledged a "year‑long assault" on the prosecution by Eps
Miami Herald article cites Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta’s non‑prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein
The passage identifies a concrete legal maneuver— a non‑prosecution agreement signed by a sitting U.S. Attorney that effectively shelved a federal indictment— linking a high‑ranking official (Acosta) FBI prepared a 53‑page federal indictment against Epstein in 2007. Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta signed a non‑prosecution agreement that sealed the indictment. Epstein received a reduced state
Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement with U.S. Attorney’s Office includes immunity for co‑conspirators and alleged violations
The passage reveals a federal non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Jeffrey Epstein and his co‑conspirators from federal charges, mentions direct involvement of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and s Epstein signed a non‑prosecution agreement on Sep 24, 2007 with the Southern District of Florida, av The agreement allegedly protected co‑conspirators, including Nadia Marcinkova, from prosecution. A
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.