Deposition excerpt referencing a $50‑million lawsuit filed by Mr. Herman and attorney‑client privilege objections
Summary
The passage provides a vague reference to a high‑value lawsuit ($50 million) filed by an individual named Mr. Herman, but offers no concrete details about the parties, the nature of the claim, or any Mr. Herman filed a $50‑million lawsuit on behalf of an unnamed client. The deposition includes repeated attorney‑client privilege objections by Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The excerpt suggests a press
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Transcript excerpt showing vague deposition scheduling and attorney-client privilege references
The passage provides only a fragmented courtroom/house oversight interview with minor, unnamed individuals (Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Tein). It lacks concrete details on transactions, dates, or Witness mentions meeting with Mr. Leopold to prepare for a deposition. Mr. Leopold allegedly could not attend due to a court appearance. Reference to an email from Mr. Leopold to Mr. Goldberger.
Deposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claims
The passage records a routine deposition dispute over privilege and mentions a lawyer (Jeffrey Herman) filing a lawsuit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, high‑level officials, or w Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of missing a hearing and obstructing the deposition. Reference to a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filing a lawsuit on the witness’s behalf. Debate over whether attorney‑cli
Privileged Discussion Over Potential $50M Lawsuit Against Jeffrey Epstein
The excerpt hints at a lawsuit filed by an individual named Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein for $50 million, but provides no concrete details such as filing dates, co Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion is framed as privileged, limiting disclosure of details. The witness and questioning attorney re
Witness refuses to confirm Leopold's $50M lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein citing privilege
The passage hints at a possible $50 million lawsuit filed by a Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no names, dates, court docket numbers, or corroborating d Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The witness claims no knowledge of the lawsuit, invoking attorney‑client privilege. The questioning appears to
Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing
The passage records a procedural disagreement about marking exhibits during a deposition. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or substantive allegations of misconduct, offer Mr. Leopold threatens court sanctions if exhibits are removed unmarked. Mr. Tein disputes the claim that exhibits are unmarked. Mr. Goldberger references long‑standing practice without prior disputes
Transcript excerpt showing a contentious deposition exchange with no clear high‑profile actors
The passage records a heated deposition dialogue but lacks any identifiable influential individuals, concrete transactions, dates, or substantive allegations. It offers minimal investigative value bey A deposition was cancelled and later reinstated without clear reason. Mr. Tein expresses frustration over the cancellation and mentions a personal impact on 'Jack'. Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger are
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.