Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-35342House OversightOther

Campus protests over Deep Throat and First Amendment debates

The passage recounts student and feminist protests against a pornographic film screening at Harvard, referencing historical censorship tactics. It contains no concrete leads involving powerful officia References to historical boycotts and blacklists during the McCarthy era. Discussion of First Amendment arguments related to pornography. Description of protests, including violent actions, at a Harv

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017199
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage recounts student and feminist protests against a pornographic film screening at Harvard, referencing historical censorship tactics. It contains no concrete leads involving powerful officia References to historical boycotts and blacklists during the McCarthy era. Discussion of First Amendment arguments related to pornography. Description of protests, including violent actions, at a Harv

Tags

first-amendmentcultural-controversycensorshipstudent-protestlegal-exposurehouse-oversightpornographyfeminist-activism

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4.2.12 WC: 191694 directed against general bookstores. We remember that boycotts had been employed widely during the McCarthy period. The threat to boycott motion-picture studios and television stations that employed “red,” “pink,” or “suspect” actors, directors, or technicians, led to the notorious “black lists” and “red channels.” In an interview with Playboy magazine, I had expressed some of those concerns: “Take what [some of these] women are now doing and ask yourself the question. Would you favor it if their objection were to books about atheism or communism instead of pornography? If you would say no, then it seems to me that you can’t be in favor of a boycott against stores that sell Playboy and Penthouse, because they’re equally protected. The dispute between civil libertarians and feminists had split the ranks of some liberals, and the issue was achieving some notoriety in the media. I had, perhaps, added some fuel to the fire by my criticism of the “new feminist censors” in several articles and speeches. I did not deny that some pornography could be degrading to women, but I argued that it is precisely the function of the First Amendment to protect those whose speech offends and degrades. I pointed out that some of the most vocal opponents of pornography inadvertently provided the most compelling arguments for its constitutional protection by characterizing it as “Fascist propaganda.” (The Fascists, not surprisingly, used to call it “Communist propaganda.”) All propaganda is within the central core of the First Amendment. Nor did I dispute the claim that some pornography may contribute to an atmosphere of violence against women. But speech often causes undesirable consequences—political violence, riots, even revolutions. That should not, I argued, be a reason for suppressing speech itself. Some radical feminists went beyond boycotts, shooting bullets through a bookstore window in Harvard Square to protest its sale of Playboy Magazine. Some theaters showing Deep Throat received threats of violence, and at least one was firebombed after the patrons left. Some of the women of Quincy House who were opposed to Deep Throat were not content to protest. First they tried to cancel the showing by calling for a vote of the students who lived in the dormitory. They lost by a margin of three to one. Forty-nine percent of the women who voted opposed the showing; and forty-eight percent favored showing Deep Throat. Next they tried to get the Harvard University administration to forbid the scheduled showing. The Dean of Students wrote a letter to the Quincy House Film Society urging it not to show Deep Throat, but he would not ban it. The members of the film society, caught up in the adversary challenge by the feminists, voted to go forward with the event. The Quincy House women, with the assistance of other feminists, decided to picket the performances and to use the occasion to sensitize students to the evils of pornography. I supported their protest. Pamphlets were prepared presenting the feminist perspective on pornography. A slide show, graphically depicting the exploitive and sexist nature of pornography, was scheduled for presentation in an adjoining room an hour before the first showing of Deep Throat. Several prominent local feminist speakers had been asked to address the hundreds of protesters expected in front of Quincy House on the evening of the first scheduled performance. [12

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01877317

0p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Bulletin Intelligence" <[email protected]>

From: "Bulletin Intelligence" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FBI Public Affairs News Briefing Monday, April 26, 2021 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:27:35 +0000 c Importan e: Normal Mobile version and searchable archives available at fbi.bulletinintelligence.com. 'L; 1 B1 News Briefing TO: THE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR STAFF DATE: MONDAY, APRIL 26, 2021 6:30 AM EDT TODAY'S TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADING THE NEWS • Garland Signals More Investigations Into Local Police Departments Will Be Forthcoming. CAPITOL VIOLENCE NEWS • FBI Using Facial Recognition, Undercover Operations To Arrest Capitol Rioters. • Growing Number Of Those Arrested In Capitol Siege Probe Have Military, Law Enforcement, Or Government Ties. • Two Kansas Women Charged In Capitol Riot Probe. • FBI Arrests Man Who Boasted On Dating App Of Storming Capitol. • Texas Couple Charged With Assaulting Officers During Capitol Siege.

40p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01447703

From: Sent: To: CC: Paul Morris Subject: Tomorrow Aracely Sanchez 9/23/2014 5:01:20 PM Jackson McCarthy I'll be out of the office tomorrow returning Thursday, September 24th. During that time I will n h v a t mil or voice mail. Should you have any funds/wire transfers please email Jackson McCarthy Thank you. Kind regards, Aracely Sanchez Aracely Sanchez Assistant WC President Deutsche Bar* Trust Company Americas Deutsche Asset 8 Wealth Management 345 Park Avenue, 24th Floor

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Buckley, Lawrence D. Jr. (DO) (FBI)"

From: "Buckley, Lawrence D. Jr. (DO) (FBI)" To: "Smith, James H. (INSD) (FBI)" <O>. Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FBI Public Affairs News Briefing Wednesday, August 05, 2020 Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 13:50:09 +0000 Importance: Normal From: Bulletin Intelligence <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 6:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FBI Public Affairs News Briefing Wednesday, August 05, 2020 Mobile version and searchable archives available at fbl.bulletInIntelligence.aun. FBI News Briefing TO: THE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR STAFF DATE: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2020 6:30 AM EDT TODAY'S TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADING THE NEWS • FBI Has Opened 300 Domestic Terror Investigations Since Floyd's Death. PROTESTS • Suspect In Salt Lake City Protest Arson Case Remains Jailed. • Tennessee Woman Is_S_econd To Face Protest Arson Charge% • Trump Touts His Efforts To Stop Portland Protests. • pence Sys Administration Will Increase Law Enfor

44p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.