Skip to content
Case File
d-35425House OversightOther

Lawrence Krauss emails expressing concern over NASA budget and potential impact on science funding

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #032522
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage contains a private email exchange where a prominent scientist criticizes a presidential administration's space policy. It mentions no concrete transactions, dates beyond the email timestam Krauss argues that increased NASA funding for large rockets will divert money from particle physics He references a $900 million cut to the DOE Office of Science that would affect his field. The ema

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

doe-budget-cutspolicy-criticismscience-policyacademic-correspondencenasa-fundingtrump-administrationhouse-oversightbudgetary-impact
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email from Lawrence Krauss criticizing Trump‑related NASA funding

The passage contains a personal opinion email from a physicist about the Trump administration's NASA bill and budget, but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates beyond the email timestamp, or Email dated March 22, 2017 from Lawrence Krauss to an unnamed recipient. Mentions a Washington Post article about Trump signing a NASA bill aimed at a Mars landing. Criticizes the bill as “show” and

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss email referencing Trump NASA bill and criticism of rocket size

The passage contains a brief, informal email from physicist Lawrence Krauss mentioning a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill. It offers no concrete details, transactions, dates beyo Email dated March 22, 2017 from Lawrence Krauss to a private address. References a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at Mars landing. Criticizes the scientific merit of a r

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss disparages Trump’s NASA funding push in private email

The email contains a personal opinion from a prominent scientist about a Trump administration NASA bill, but provides no concrete evidence, transaction details, or actionable leads linking high‑level Krauss calls the Trump administration’s NASA and defense spending a "show" and criticizes the focus He references a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at a Mars landing. Th

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss emails expressing concern over Trump‑era NASA funding and DOE science cuts

The passage is a personal email expressing opinion about budget priorities and potential cuts to particle physics. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transaction details, or evidence of mi Krauss warns that a $900 million cut to the DOE Office of Science would harm particle physics resear He characterizes the Trump administration’s focus on large space projects as “glory‑seeking” rathe

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss email warning about NASA Mars rocket funding linked to Trump‑signed bill

The passage contains a brief, unsubstantiated comment from a scientist criticizing a Trump‑signed NASA bill. It mentions President Trump but provides no concrete details, transactions, or actionable l Email dated March 22, 2017 from Lawrence Krauss to a private individual. Krauss criticizes a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at a Mars mission, calling it non‑scientific. Reference to a Washington Post

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing secular vs religious dogma

The document contains a casual academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confir Krauss and Chomsky exchange views on religion, secular dogma, and academic discourse. Reference to a New Yorker article about militant atheism. No substantive claims about misconduct, financial flows

2p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.