Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36042House OversightOther

Proposed Rule to Grant Crime Victims Right to Counsel and Voice in Defendant Release Decisions

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017761
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage outlines legislative proposals for victim representation and hearing rights, but it contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, or novel revelations involving high‑profile offic Rule 44.1 would allow courts to appoint volunteer counsel for crime victims, pending congressional a The Criminal Victims Rights Act (CVRA) authorizes funding for victim representation and mandates p

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

legislative-proposalspolicy-proposalcourt-rulespro-bono-counsellegal-reformcriminal-justice-reformhouse-oversightvictim-rights
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 47 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *915 certain cases. Title /8 U.S.C. 3509 provides, "The court may appoint a guardian ad litem for a child who was a victim of, or a witness to, a crime involving abuse or exploitation to protect the best interests of the child." Congress, however, has not yet provided funding for this particular right. 37? Finally, in unusual circumstances where a crime victim may also face possible criminal charges of his or her own, the Criminal Justice Act would authorize appointment of and payment for defense counsel. 323 Proposed Rule 44.1 would confirm the existing discretionary power of the courts to appoint volunteer counsel. The rule is purely discretionary (the court "may" appoint counsel) and is limited to [*916] situations where the interests of justice require appointment. The rule does not address payment for counsel, as this matter must be left to subsequent appropriations from Congress. The court, however, can ask for volunteer counsel to assist victims on a pro bono basis. There is reason to expect that some attorneys will volunteer. Not only are many attorneys willing to undertake pro bono representation, but the CVRA itself authorizes millions of dollars in funding for victim representation around the country. The authorization includes support for the National Crime Victims Law Institute at the Northwestern School of Law at Lewis and Clark College to help establish eleven legal offices around the country representing crime victims. 324 Finally, it might be argued that it is unnecessary to address this subject in a rule because the court's inherent authority to appoint counsel exists even without a rule. Both courts and victims, however, will find it useful to have this authority spelled out in the criminal rules to eliminate any lingering doubt. In addition, the CVRA obliges prosecutors to eliminate any lingering doubt in the event of any material conflict of interest between the prosecutor and the victim by "advising the crime victim that the crime victim can seek the advice of an attorney." 32° This requirement may frequently require prosecutors to help victims obtain legal counsel. Accordingly, a separate rule on this subject is appropriate. For all these reasons, the rules should be amended to recognize the court's authority to appoint volunteer counsel to represent a crime victim. [*917] Rule 46 - Victims’ Right To Be Heard Regarding Defendant's Release from Custody The Proposal: Victims should be explicitly given the right to be heard regarding the defendant's release from custody as follows: (k) Victims' Right To Be Heard. A victim has the right to be heard regarding any decision to release the defendant. The court shall consider the views of victims in making any release decision, including such decisions in petty cases. In a case where the court finds that the number of victims makes it impracticable to accord all of the victims the right to be heard in open court, the court shall fashion a reasonable procedure to facilitate hearing from representative victims. The Rationale: 320 See, e.g., D. Utah Civ. R. 83-1.1(6)(3) (1997) (“Any attorney who is admitted to the bar of this court must agree, as a condition of such admission, to engage in a reasonable level of pro bono work when requested to do so by the court."). 321 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1) (2000) (emphasis added). 322 Memorandum from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to the United States District Court Judges and the United States Magistrate Judges (March 19, 1991) (available from the Administrative Office). 323 See 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(1). 324 See 42 U.S.C. 10603(d) (2000); see also 150 Cong. Rec. $4266 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (noting appropriations for the National Crime Victims Law Institution "to provide grants and assistance to lawyers to help victims of crime in court" with funding sufficient to "provide for two new regional offices and nine specific clinics"). For more information on NCVLL see /ttp://(www.ncvii.org. 325 18 US.C.A. 3771(c)(2) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005). DAVID SCHOEN

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Law review article proposes extensive amendments to Federal Criminal Rules to implement Crime Victims' Rights Act

The document outlines policy proposals for rule changes but contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving specific powerful actors. It is a scholarly discussion, offering Identifies gaps in current Federal Rules where victims are barely mentioned. Cites legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and related statutes. Proposes specific rule amendments

103p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposed amendment to Rule 32(f) to require victim‑related notice before upward sentencing departures

The passage discusses a scholarly proposal to change sentencing procedure by mandating notice of victim impact‑statement‑based upward departures. It references circuit splits but does not name any spe Suggests amendment to Rule 32(f) requiring victim’s attorney or prosecutor to raise objections to pr Calls for notice to defense when upward departure arguments rely on victim information. Highlights

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5122 a 2, 1:31 PM

5122 a 2, 1:31 PM WIKIPEDIA Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Edward Epstein (flpstin/ EP-steenAl January 20, 1953 — August to, 2019) was an American financier and convicted sex offender.13)[4] Epstein, who was born and raised in Brooklyn, New York Citr, began his professional life by teaching at the Dalton School in Manhattan, despite lacking a college degree. After his dismiccsl from the school, he entered the banking and finance sector, working at Bear Stearns in various roles; he eventually started his own firm. Epstein developed an elite social circle and procured many women and children; he and some of his associates then sexually abused them Is&DNA. In zoo ice in Palm Beach Florida be an investi atin Epstein after a parent complained that he had sexually abused her 14-year-old dauv,hter.g. Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute.a-9.1 He ser

24p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

12/05/07 THU 15:25 FAX 305 530 5450

12/05/07 THU 15:25 FAX 305 530 5450 EXECUTIVE OFFICE sss TRANSMISSION OK TX REPORT sits TX/RX NO 3413 CONNECTION TEL 012125464900 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 12/06 15:22 USAGE T 03'18 PCS. RESULT OK U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of" Florida UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 99 NE 4Th STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132-2111 MEP Attorney Staff Assistant FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: December 6, 2007 TO: Jay Leflcowitz, Esquire FAX NUMBER: SUBJECT: Epstein NUMBER OF PACES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 9 EFTA00214748 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 99 NE 4Th STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132-2111 Cyndee Campos Staff Assistant Attorney FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: December 6, 2007 TO: Jay Lefkowitz, Esquire FAX NUMBER: SUBJECT: Epstein NUMBER OF PAGES, INCL

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: draft letter to DAG I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Airs: Assistant LAS Auorney 99N.& eth Street Aftam: Ft 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL EXPRESS June 2, 2008 Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein is a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors. In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. Marie Villafana of our West Palm Beach b

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IthibiSlornam

IthibiSlornam taco L•fhwitit EFTA00176182 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 99 M.E. 41' Street Miami, FL 33132-211! (305) 961-9299 Facsimile: (305) 530-6444 December 6, 2007 I write in response to your recent e-mails and letters regarding victim notification and other issues. Our Office is trying to perform our contractual obligations under the Agreement, which we feel are being frustrated by defense counsel's objections. The Office also is concerned about Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. More than three weeks ago we spoke about the failure to set a timely plea and sentencing date. At that time, you assured me that the scheduling delay was caused by the unavailability of Judge McSorley. You promised that a date would be set promptly. On November 15th, Roland

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.