Defense Counsel
The defendant's legal representation
Mentioned in 30 documents. Roles: The defendant's legal representation, Recipient of discovery materials and responsible for handling Confidential Information, The attorneys representing the Defendant, The lawyers representing the defendant, Legal representation for the defendant
Defense Counsel is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary (1)]
2025-12-19
“DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigatio”
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary]
2025-12-19
“DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigatio”
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [(U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 1 Red Notebook (U) (NY-ERF#18399) Court Authorized Intercept-Doc#20-CRIM-21340Facility-917-520-3106 Disc#690612-R1 (U) (NY-ERF# 18727) Court Authorized Intercept Doc#20-CRIM-81211Facility-917-520-3106 Blu-Ray Disc#694397 (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 10 Photographs (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 17 Miscellaneous Financial Documents (U) (NY-ERF# 18309) Court Authorized Intercept Doc# 19-CRIM-29845156Facility-917-520-3106 Disc# 671455 (U) Recorded Interview (Non-Custodial - Overt) DTD 8/13/2019 with Holly Arace - Philadelphia (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 1 Premier Day Planner " 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report Executive Summary]
2025-12-19
“DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigatio”
Court hearing references alleged trafficking of witness to foreign presidents and world leaders
2025-11-11
“The excerpt mentions vague claims that a witness was trafficked to foreign presidents and world lead”
Court docket entry for State v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County, Feb 20, 2008
2025-11-11
“The passage is a routine court filing showing basic case information and attorney appearances. It pr”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 81 documents”
Known Connections (19)
Document Mentions (19)
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary (1)]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [(U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 1 Red Notebook (U) (NY-ERF#18399) Court Authorized Intercept-Doc#20-CRIM-21340Facility-917-520-3106 Disc#690612-R1 (U) (NY-ERF# 18727) Court Authorized Intercept Doc#20-CRIM-81211Facility-917-520-3106 Blu-Ray Disc#694397 (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 10 Photographs (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 17 Miscellaneous Financial Documents (U) (NY-ERF# 18309) Court Authorized Intercept Doc# 19-CRIM-29845156Facility-917-520-3106 Disc# 671455 (U) Recorded Interview (Non-Custodial - Overt) DTD 8/13/2019 with Holly Arace - Philadelphia (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 1 Premier Day Planner " 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report Executive Summary]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...
Court hearing references alleged trafficking of witness to foreign presidents and world leaders
The excerpt mentions vague claims that a witness was trafficked to foreign presidents and world leaders, but provides no names, dates, transactions, or concrete evidence. It suggests a possible lead a Witness alleges being trafficked to foreign presidents and world leaders. Defense counsel seeks to exclude those statements from evidence. No specific foreign leaders, dates, or financial details are
Court docket entry for State v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County, Feb 20, 2008
The passage is a routine court filing showing basic case information and attorney appearances. It provides no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level actors beyond the Case number and date of hearing Names of state and defense counsel Location of the hearing in Palm Beach County
Court filing references expert testimony on age‑of‑consent issues in Giuffre case
The passage merely outlines procedural arguments about expert testimony and jurisdictional age‑of‑consent statutes in a civil case. It mentions no new financial flows, misconduct, or high‑level offici Defense counsel argues victim‑blaming narrative could affect jury perception. Discussion of protective order scope if parties reside in Australia. Reference to age‑of‑consent statutes in Florida vs.
Defense team seeks protective sidebar to shield Boies Schiller lawyers from alleged aggressive language in trial
The passage is a routine procedural request in a court case, mentioning only the defense firm and its attorneys. It lacks concrete allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level official Defense counsel requests a sidebar or in‑camera hearing to prevent certain statements from reaching Mentions alleged aggressive language by the defense team toward the plaintiff’s team. Specifically
Victim Privacy Concerns in Federal Subpoena Procedures Highlighted by 2007 Case and Advisory Committee Proposal
The passage discusses procedural flaws in how victim-sensitive records can be subpoenaed without notice, citing a specific 2007 federal case and an email from then‑U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein. While Defense counsel used Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c) to obtain a victim's VA medical records ex parte and und Victim and prosecutor were unaware of the subpoena until counsel warned of potential harm. Current
Advisory Committee Rule Amendments and Victims' Rights in Federal Criminal Procedure
The passage outlines historical changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and discusses the Advisory Committee's role in protecting victims' interests. While it mentions statutory authority (e.g. Advisory Committee amended Rule 11(a)(2) in 1983 to standardize conditional guilty pleas. Rule 32(b)(2) was changed in 1994 to allow defense counsel presence during probation officer intervi Rule 51
Deposition excerpt hints at possible misrepresentation by Dershowitz/Epstein defense regarding flight logs and alleged arrest
The transcript contains vague references to Professor Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein’s defense team, and a disputed arrest of a ‘Miss Roberts’. It raises questions about whether defense counsel prep Witness questioned about an alleged arrest of Miss Roberts that may not be reflected in interrogator Reference to Professor Dershowitz possibly testifying falsely or omitting information. Inquiry whe
Internal memo reveals aggressive defense strategy for Jeffrey Epstein involving high‑profile attorneys and attempts to disqualify prosecutors
The passage details a coordinated defense effort for Epstein that included Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, and other senior legal figures, and describes attempts to disqualify prosecutors. It suggests Defense team hired Alan Dershowitz, former Dean Kenneth Starr, and other senior lawyers for Epstein. Defense counsel attempted to disqualify at least two prosecutors by investigating their personal l
Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Jeffrey Epstein Case Involving Federal Prosecutors and FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman
The passage alleges irregular conduct by the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, including inappropriate involvement of a First Assistant U.S. Attorney (Jeffrey Sloman) in both the Epstein case and a separa FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman allegedly participated in the initial phone call with Epstein's defense counsel AUSA Marie Villafana issued document requests for Epstein's 2004‑2005 tax returns and medical reco
Epstein Defense Counsel Claims Federal Sex Offender Registration and Charges Were Improperly Pursued
The passage details internal communications between Epstein’s counsel and the South District of Florida (SDFL) regarding alleged procedural improprieties in federal charges and sex offender registrati Counsel argued that 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) was not applicable because no interstate communication was us Multiple letters (Dec 14, 17, 21, 26 2007) show attempts to persuade the SDFL to drop or modify ch
Judge refuses to view 'Deep Throat' in obscenity case, allows public screening
The passage describes a courtroom dispute over viewing a pornographic film for obscenity purposes. It contains no new allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑level officials. The only act Judge Alberti demanded to view the film before ruling on an injunction. Defense counsel refused to watch the film, arguing constitutional grounds. Judge ultimately declined to block the screening, de
Alleged undisclosed non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and possible prosecutorial misconduct
The passage suggests that a U.S. Attorney’s Office entered into a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein that was not disclosed to victims, and that prosecutors may have coordinated with Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee alleges the USAO concealed a non‑prosecution agreement with Epste Former federal prosecutor Hakes claims prosecutors consulted defense counsel on victim‑notificatio
Showing 15 of 19 documents. View all →
Email Mentions (6)
Alex Acosta update I Power Line
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.php Alex Acosta update Earlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his wa
Re: Hello
Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I get your point. Couple of things: 1. This the inves
Alex Acosta update I Power Line
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.php Alex Acosta update Earlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his way
Re: Alex Acosta update | Power Line
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.phpAlex Acosta updateEarlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his way out
Fwd: Alex Acosta update | Power Line
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.phpAlex Acosta updateEarlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his way out
Re: Hello
Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I get your point. Couple of things: 1. This the inves
This dossier on Defense Counsel was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.