Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36082House OversightOther

Irrelevant text about Jeffrey Dahmer with no actionable investigative content

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015358
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage consists of sensationalist commentary and historical facts about a known serial killer, offering no new leads, actors, financial flows, or misconduct involving current powerful individuals Contains a quoted AP dispatch about Jeffrey Dahmer's trial Includes graphic, unrelated commentary No mention of current officials, agencies, or financial transactions

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

media-commentaryserial-killerhistoricalhouse-oversight
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
what’ s that? What’ s this guy doing? What’ s going on here? [Screams] Oh oh oh oh oh OH OH OH OH OH OOQQOQOHHHHHH NOOOOOOO!!! Live in Hell!!!” The majority of cannibalistic serial killers are motivated by a kind of necrophilia--it’ s usually a highly sexually arousing experience for them when they eat their victims. Here, from my “Great Moments in Necrophilia” file, is a dispatch from Associated Press: “The prosecution in the insanity trial of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer rested its case. Dahmer has confessed to killing and dismembering 17 young males since 1978. A jury must decide if he will be sent to prison or a mental institution. The final prosecution witness, Dr. Park Dietz, a psychiatrist, testified that Dahmer wore condoms when having sex with his dead victims, showing that he could control his urge to have intercourse with corpses.” | smell a public service announcement there: “If Jeffrey Dahmer is sane enough to have safe sex, what about you?”

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, fe...

This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, featuring testimony from Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on human memory and false memories, and Dr. Park Dietz on psychiatry and behavioral science. The experts are expected to challenge the prosecution's evidence and expert opinions.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Sihlo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 14, 2021 BY EMAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The parties respectfully submit this joint letter to provide the Court with a list of names, places, and relevant entities, for purposes of examining prospective jurors during voir dire. This letter is respectfully requested to be filed under seal to protect the privacy of witnesses and third parties. I. List of Names The following is a list of names that jurors may hear at trial: • Juan Alessi • Maria Alessi • • Janusz Banasiak • • Daniel Besselsen • • • • Michael Buscemi EFTA00040231 Page 2 • • Tracy Chappell • • Dr. Park Dietz

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC 0: DATE FILED:i 102121 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Defense on November 1, 2021, noticed eight expert witnesses. Def. Br., Ex. 1 ("Notice"). Two of those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has already addressed that motion. On November 15, 2021, the Government moved to fully or partially preclude the testimony of the remaining six experts. The Defense filed a response on November 19, 2021. The Court addresses the motion to preclude Dr. Hall in this separate opinion. It will address the other five e

17p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FIADDON

FIADDON MORGAN FOREMAN November 1, 2021 VIA EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Haddon Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. Paglitica 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell through counsel, submit the following summary pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(C). I. EXPERT DISCLOSURE BY THE DEFENSE A. Dr. Elizabeth Loftus Dr. Loftus is the Distinguished Professor of Psychological Science and Law at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. Dr. Loftus is one of the nation's leading experts on the science of memory. In addition to her experience as an academic and clinical researcher, she has been an expert witness or consultant in hundreds of cases. Her extensive experience and credentials are recited in her curric

14p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00010184

0p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghisla...

The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing to preclude certain expert testimonies from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus based on the Daubert standard and other legal precedents. The government contests various aspects of the proposed testimonies, including opinions on hindsight bias, false memory formation, and witness credibility. The memorandum aims to exclude or limit the defense's expert witnesses' testimonies.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.