Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36483House OversightDeposition

Court hearing on defamation motion involving Maxwell and prior sexual assault testimony

The passage is a routine courtroom dialogue about procedural motions and references a defamation case involving Maxwell. It contains no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads lin Discussion of an omnibus motion to exclude certain evidence Reference to a defamation claim involving Maxwell Mention of prior sexual assault testimony as a separate issue

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011320
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a routine courtroom dialogue about procedural motions and references a defamation case involving Maxwell. It contains no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads lin Discussion of an omnibus motion to exclude certain evidence Reference to a defamation claim involving Maxwell Mention of prior sexual assault testimony as a separate issue

Tags

defamationlegal-motionslegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-assault-testimonycourt-proceedings

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 1) H3VOGIU1 into consideration whether she could have sued six people for it, 20 other people for it, this case is about Maxwell and her defamation against my client. So again, your Honor, if you look at Sack on Defamation, it addresses that directly, and we believe that that should not come into evidence. So your Honor, that's the first chunk of the omnibus motion that I was addressing. I'm not sure how you want to take it, if you want to have opposing counsel speak on those issues now and then move to the others, or if you want us to keep moving through it? THI 1a COURT: What's your preference? MS. McCAWLEY: I think keep moving through it would be great. THE COURT: What? Gl MS. McCAWLEY: To keep moving it through it, if that's all right, so we can get through argument and then have them address it? THE, COURT: Sure. MS. McCAWLEY: Thank you, your Honor. MS. SCHULTZ: Your Honor, this is Meredith Schultz for the plaintiff. The next article in the omnibus motion is to exclude testimony references to prior sexual assault. This is an issue that I spoke on yesterday related to another motion regarding the same, so I'll keep it brief. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300
Wire Refreferences

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.