Transcript excerpt shows heated exchange over alleged witness coaching in House Oversight hearing
Summary
The passage only records procedural objections and accusations of coaching between counsel and a witness without naming any officials, transactions, or substantive allegations. It offers no actionable Mr. Leopold objects to repeated questioning and claims he has answered previously. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of coaching the witness and attempts to stop him from speaking. The exchange occurs dur
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Courtroom exchange featuring Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein with vague references to surveillance and name‑tag switching
The excerpt contains a disjointed transcript with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It hints at someone being searched for and a possible surveillance incident, but provid Witness mentions being aware that 'people were looking for me' without identifying who they were. Reference to a night when the witness and a friend 'switched name tags' – unclear relevance. Repeated
Deposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claims
The passage records a routine deposition dispute over privilege and mentions a lawyer (Jeffrey Herman) filing a lawsuit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, high‑level officials, or w Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of missing a hearing and obstructing the deposition. Reference to a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filing a lawsuit on the witness’s behalf. Debate over whether attorney‑cli
House Oversight hearing excerpt showing contentious questioning of a witness
The passage records a procedural dispute during a hearing but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers minimal investigative val Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Leopold argue over repeated questioning of a witness. The witness is accused of lying after answering the same question multiple times. No specific allegations, financial flows
Fragmented House Oversight Transcript with No Substantive Claims
The passage consists of disjointed dialogue from a hearing with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers no actionable leads or novel information about influential actors Contains brief mentions of Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger. References attorney-client privilege objections. No specific misconduct, transactions, or policy issues identified.
Fragmented House Oversight transcript mentions reimbursement by federal prosecutors
The excerpt provides a vague courtroom exchange with no concrete names, dates, or transaction details. It hints at a possible reimbursement from federal prosecutors but lacks specifics needed for acti Witness discusses not spending money and being at a location called "Marshall's" Reference to federal prosecutors informing the witness about a reimbursement Multiple objections by "Mr. Leopold" indi
Fragmented deposition transcript mentioning Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and a photograph ID 18-001
The excerpt is heavily redacted and incoherent, offering no concrete names of high‑profile officials, specific transactions, dates, or actionable details. It merely records a brief exchange about a ph Mentions individuals named Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger in a deposition context. Reference to a photograph labeled 18-001 and a subpoena served to the witness. Possible hint at a record‑keeping or
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.