Deposition excerpt mentions civil complaint against Jeff Epstein for $50 million
Summary
The passage provides a vague reference to a civil complaint against Jeff Epstein and a deposition quote, but lacks concrete details such as parties, dates, or evidence of wrongdoing beyond the complai Witness admits writing an exhibit containing profanity about a court proceeding. Deposition question references a visit to Jeff Epstein’s house three years prior. Civil complaint filed for $50 millio
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
“...4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 12 13 ~0929104. TXT answered. THE WITNESS: No, | did not. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You didn't write this exhibit? A. ! wrote that, but | didn't write what you said. Q. You wro...”
The Witness“a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 12 13 ~0929104. TXT answered. THE WITNESS: No, | did not. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You didn't write this exhibit? A. ! wrote that, but | didn't wri...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 100 nsor & Associates RepornnE sad Transcripoon. Inc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 75 Q. Because Mr. Epstein never came to your dad's house, correct? A. Correct. Q. And no one who worked for Mr. Epstein ever did something to your dad's tires, did they? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of foundation, predicate. Don't guess. BY MR. TEIN: Q. It's not true that Mr. Epstein almost killed your father, is it? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and answered, lack of foundation, predicate. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You can answer. A. No. Q. Now you told the police that you didn't know who was in the car with you and IIIIIII on the day you went to Epstein's house, didn't you? A. Yes. Q. And that was a lie, wasn't it? A. It's the truth. Q. You told the police that there was someone in the car next to you and you specifically said y
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing questioning Mr. Leopold about alleged drug habit of his twin sister
The passage provides a vague, fragmented exchange with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations linking any high‑ranking official or powerful entity to misconduct. It lacks a Witness is questioned about a twin sister's alleged drug habit. Accusations of lying about a visit to a crack house in Georgia are raised. Multiple objections are raised by Mr. Leopold, indicating co
Testimony on alleged underage relationship involving Palm Beach firefighter Brett
The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about a possible underage sexual relationship involving a local firefighter. It lacks concrete names beyond the firefighter, no financial or political c Witness questioned about a 22‑year‑old Palm Beach firefighter named Brett dating an underage girl. Questions focus on whether the fire department or police were aware of the relationship. No specific
Deposition transcript excerpt from Florida state court filing (House Oversight case)
The passage only contains procedural boilerplate of a deposition (names of court reporter, witness affirmation, and a trivial question) with no substantive allegations, names of influential actors, fi Document is a deposition record from a Florida state court case. Witness is sworn before court reporter Judith F. Consor. Only a generic introductory question is shown.
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight deposition showing heated exchange over exhibit handling
The passage records a minor procedural dispute in a deposition with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers little investigative value beyond confirming normal courtroom Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of misrepresenting the record. Dispute over labeling and copying of exhibits. Witness expresses willingness to disagree professionally.
Witness testimony excerpt referencing sexual history and Epstein
The passage provides a fragmented courtroom transcript with limited details—no concrete names, dates, or transactions beyond a vague reference to Epstein. It lacks actionable leads, novel information, Witness mentions being one year younger than 'Zack JJ' and two years younger than another person. Names 'Ryan' are mentioned without context. Witness denies oral sex and exchanging sex for value befo
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.