Medicare Funding Deficits and Structural ShortfallsCourt Interpretations of CVRA Victim Rights and OLC Memorandum Overreach
Case File
d-36890House OversightOtherAlleged Comey motive linking Marc Rich pardon to Clinton and potential retaliation
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025163
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The email contains unverified, speculative claims that James Comey may have personal motives tied to the Clinton pardon of Marc Rich, referencing alleged Israeli pressure and a possible vendetta. It n Claims Comey was “hunting down” Marc Rich for indictment. Alleged Israeli official (Ehud) asked Clinton to pardon Rich for Mossad work. Suggestion that Clinton’s pardon was granted and that Comey hol
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
foreign-influencelegal-misconductpolitical-intriguepersonal-vendettalegal-exposurehouse-oversightemail-leak
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #025163
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: 11/28/2016 6:47:15 PM
To: Pritzker, Tom
Subject: Re: Re:
Importance: High
comey knows that denise neeed to pledge 500k to foundation
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Pritzker, Tom wrote:
Read an interesting article on why Comey screwed Clinton. Came from Israeli press.
1. Comey as DA is hunting down Marc Rich to indict him.
2. Ehud calls Clinton and says please pardon Marc Rich he has done work for Mossad that has been valuable.
3. Clinton pardons Rich and Comey has been pissed ever since.
4. Comey got his opening to get even.
No idea if this is accurate story.
tjp
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 12:39 PM
To: Pritzker, Tom <__________________________
Subject: Re:
barrack and the boys in pb, wild wild.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Pritzker, Tom - > wrote:
Will check
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 12:35 PM
To: Pritzker, Tom
Subject:
im in wed, fri. edelman?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are
not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error,
please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error,
please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.