Skip to content
Case File
d-37183House OversightEmail

Email from Lawrence Krauss to Noam Chomsky containing a New Yorker link and confidentiality disclaimer

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #028940
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage contains a routine academic correspondence with no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level officials. It lacks actionable leads, controversy, or novel info Email dated September 10, 2015 between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky. Includes a link to a New Yorker article about scientists and militant atheism. Contains a standard attorney‑client/confidentia

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

academic-correspondenceconfidentiality-disclaimerhouse-oversightemail
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss forwards New Yorker article to Noam Chomsky and Jeffery

The passage contains only a routine email forwarding a public article with a standard confidentiality disclaimer. It provides no concrete leads, names, transactions, or allegations linking powerful ac Email sent by physicist Lawrence Krauss to Noam Chomsky and an unknown recipient. Includes link to a New Yorker article about scientists and militant atheism. Standard attorney‑client/confidentiality

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Casual email chain among academics discussing religion and article links

The document contains a personal email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and an unnamed individual. It discusses opinions on fanaticism and shares a New Yorker article link. There are no Email participants are public intellectuals, not government officials. No mention of financial transactions, legal matters, or policy decisions. Contains standard confidentiality disclaimer typical o

2p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky with no substantive allegations

The document contains a routine correspondence about an article and personal opinions, lacking any concrete leads, allegations, or connections to powerful actors or wrongdoing. It offers no actionable Email dated September 10, 2015 between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky. Mentions a New Yorker article about scientists and militant atheism. Includes Krauss' professional titles and contact informat

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss discussing secular dogma and academic discourse

The passage contains a routine academic correspondence with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to powerful officials or controversial actions. It lacks actionable leads, novelty, or Conversation between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss dated September 2015. Discussion focuses on secular dogma, American exceptionalism, and academic freedom. No mention of specific wrongdoing, fina

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing secular vs religious dogma

The document contains a casual academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confir Krauss and Chomsky exchange views on religion, secular dogma, and academic discourse. Reference to a New Yorker article about militant atheism. No substantive claims about misconduct, financial flows

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing religion and secular dogma

The passage contains a routine academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Participants: Lawrence Krauss (ASU professor), Noam Chomsky (public intellectual), and a private ema Topic: Debate over the role of religion and secular nationalism in society. No mention of any government b

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.