Deposition excerpt mentions David Boies representing [REDACTED - Survivor] and references sex‑trafficking complaints involving Jane Doe plaintiffs

01:48:51 04:48:53 04:48:56 04:48:59 04:49:02 01:49:07 04:49:11 04:48:13 04:49:15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 orest? 10 oraane 14 orag20 12 oraa21 13 orao21 14 ovas22 15 oras22 16 oras26 17 oraoze 18 oras26 19 orao2s 20 orssza 21 orsex0 22 orao30 23 arse 24 ovaon2 25 01:49:32 01:48:32 01:49:33 01:49:37 01:48:37 01:49:38 04:49:38 01:49:39 01:49:40 OoOonrnt nah Wh = oraoar 10 oragas 11 orasas 12 ovagaa 13 orasso 14 oraese 15 oraass 16 oraase 17 o1s001 18 orsoos 19 orso0a 20 orso0s 24 or50.07 22 orsoto 23 orsot2 24 onsets 25 25 of 38 sheets 97 Another thing that I had, and I will not reveal any privileged communications here or any confidential information, but on December 30th, I was aware that one of the preeminent lawyers in the United States, David Boies, had agreed to represent [REDACTED]. And given the vast amount of business that -- that, you know, tries to get in the door -- MR. SIMPSON: Could I interrupt? I mean, I think we are going towards a waiver here. MS. McCAWLEY: Yeah. No, no, no, I do not -- MR. SIMPSON: We can't have testimony about -- MS. McCAWLEY: Yeah. MR. SIMPSON: -- this is one of the most respected people in the country, or lawyers in the country, and then you won't answer the questions -- THE WITNESS: Okay. MR. SIMPSON: -- you said not to answer. MS. McCAWLEY: Oh. Well, describing David Boies in general -- MR. SIMPSON: I agree with the description. MS. McCAWLEY: -- doesn't constitute a waiver. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 98 MR. SIMPSON: He's a distinguished lawyer. MR, SCAROLA: And I don't think we are getting beyond anything that is a matter of public record. MR. SIMPSON: I just -- I -- MS. McCAWLEY: But I appreciate you -- MR, SIMPSON: Be aware of waiver. MS, McCAWLEY: -- letting me know that. THE WITNESS: Allright. I will be -- I will not waive anything, and if I start to do that, I would certainly request the opportunity to -- to retract what I'm doing, but I was aware -- since the issue is, well, what's in the public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerful country in the world. There were two attorneys who argued that case in front of the United States Supreme Court, and arguing for the Democratic Presidential Candidate, Al Gore, was David Boies. He had put his credibility on the line in arguing the Bush versus Gore case, and without ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 04:50:49 01:80:22 04:50:24 04:50:27 04:50:30 01:50:34 04:50:37 01:50:41 OOnr Dan kh WOH 01:50:46 04:50:50 10 04:50:56 11 01:51:01 12 01:51:03 13 04:51:09 14 OFSh14 15 04:51:19 16 On S424 17 04:51:30 18 OLSEST 19 04:51:33 20 orsia 21 04:54:36 22 01:51:96 23 04:51:40 24 04:54:42 25 04:54:45 04:54:48 04:54:48 On:5151 O4S4:54 OSTS7 0:52.00 04,52:03 Cont oak WOH = 04:52,05 04:52:07 10 01:52:09 11 04:52:11 12 04:52:13 13 04:52:17 14 orsz19 15 onsza1 16 ors22s 17 04:52:29 18 01:52:33 19 04:52:35 20 04:52:36 21 01:52:39 22 01:52:42 23 04:52:45 24 O4S2:54 25 99 going into any confidential communications or trying to waive in any way, I knew that David Boies had agreed to represent [REDACTED], which gave me additional confidence in the fact that I was also representing this young woman in her effort to bring sex traffickers to justice, and those who had sexually abused her to justice. And so those are things that come to mind immediately as -- let me just take a second and see if there were other things regarding Dershowitz that -- that come immediately -- immediately to mind. Oh, one of the things was in the Jane Doe 102 complaint, which alleged academicians that had -- that had abused -- sexually abused Jane Doe 3, there -- there were -- so that raises a question, obviously, of who were the academicians that Bob Josefsberg had identified? I can't recall, actually. Let me -- the record should be clear, I can't recall immediately whether it was singular or plural. It may have been plural, but if it's singular, I don't want to suggest that there were other academicians, but at least one academician had sexually abused Jane Doe 3, according to the ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 400 complaint that had been filed by Bob Josefsberg. There were two things that were of interest to that: One was that Mr. Epstein, the man that I wasn't able to get information from because he was invoking the Fifth, had refused or declined to file an answer to that complaint. Rather than deny the allegations, he had, ultimately, it's my understanding -- I don’t have inside information and I'm not trying to waive any information, but my understanding is that rather than answer the complaint, he settled the case through the payment of some kind of compensation that Jane Doe 102 found desirable for dropping her claim. The other thing that I found interesting is that Josefsberg's partner, I believe it is, Miss Ezell, had been to some of the depositions of, for example, I believe Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. And I believe at least one of those, and perhaps both of those. And she had asked questions about Alan Dershowitz in those depositions, but had not asked questions about other academics in those depositions. So that led me to conclude that Bob Josefsberg and his outstanding law firm had ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 Page 97 to 100 of 151 10/20/2015 01:07:28 PM HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010834