Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-37780House OversightOther

Academic commentary on Arab uprisings and social change

The passage provides a theoretical discussion of the Arab uprisings with no specific allegations, names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads involving high‑profile actors. It cites scholarly work Describes Mohamed Bouazizi's self‑immolation as catalyst for Arab uprisings. Notes role of communications technology in mobilizing protests. References scholarly sources on revolution theory and poli

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023482
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a theoretical discussion of the Arab uprisings with no specific allegations, names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads involving high‑profile actors. It cites scholarly work Describes Mohamed Bouazizi's self‑immolation as catalyst for Arab uprisings. Notes role of communications technology in mobilizing protests. References scholarly sources on revolution theory and poli

Tags

political-theorysocial-movementshistorical-analysisarab-springhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
2D The part of social change that is the hardest to understand in a positivistic way is the moral dimension—that is, the ideas that people carry around in their heads regarding legitimacy, justice, dignity and community. The current Arab uprising was triggered by the self- immolation of an overeducated 26-year-old Tunisian vegetable seller whose cart was repeatedly confiscated by the authorities. After Mohamed Bouazizi was slapped by a policewoman when he tried to complain, he reached the end of his tether. Bouazizi’s public suicide turned into a social movement because contemporary communications technologies facilitated the growth of a new social space where middle-class people could recognize and organize around their common interests. We will probably never understand, even in retrospect, why the dry tinder of outraged dignity suddenly ignited in this fashion in December 2010 as opposed to 2009, or ten years before that, and why the conflagration spread to some Arab countries but not to others. But we can certainly do a better job in putting together the few pieces we do understand, in a way that would be useful to policymakers coping with the reality of social change. 1 Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies: With a New Forward by Francis Fukuyama (Yale University Press, 2006). 2Davies, “Towards a Theory of Revolution”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 27 (1962). 3Zakaria, The Future of Freedom: IIliberal Democracy at Home and Abroad (W. W. Norton, 2003); see also Zakaria, “A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew”, Foreign Affairs (March/April 1994). 4For a description of the Wolfenson presidency, see Sebastian Mallaby, The World’s Banker: A Story of Failed States, Financial Crises, and the Wealth and Poverty of Nations (Penguin Press, 2004). 5See Harold James’s retroview, entitled “Growing Pains”, of a classic December 1963 essay by Mancur Olson (“Rapid Growth as a Destabilizing Force”) in The American Interest (September/October 2006).

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.