Skip to main content
Skip to content
Alleged Clinton orgy claims in off‑record emailOGIS Recommendations for Improving FOIA and Dispute Resolution Programs
Case File
d-37984House OversightOther

Kirkland & Ellis LLP urges investigation into alleged undisclosed exculpatory evidence in a federal prosecution

The passage raises a generic claim of misconduct and undisclosed evidence but provides no concrete names, dates, transactions, or specific allegations. It suggests a possible lead but lacks actionable Law firm alleges extraordinary misconduct in an ongoing federal case. Claims there is undisclosed exculpatory evidence and additional leaks. States they lack subpoena power to pursue deeper investiga

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012170
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage raises a generic claim of misconduct and undisclosed evidence but provides no concrete names, dates, transactions, or specific allegations. It suggests a possible lead but lacks actionable Law firm alleges extraordinary misconduct in an ongoing federal case. Claims there is undisclosed exculpatory evidence and additional leaks. States they lack subpoena power to pursue deeper investiga

Tags

legal-oversightpotential-misconductpotential-evidence-suppressionfederal-prosecutionlegal-exposurehouse-oversightlaw-firm-statement
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #012170

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Most important, however, is that the extraordinary nature of this misconduct, so unusual in ordinary federal prosecutions, raises the gravest of concerns about why prosecutors would go to such lengths in a case already being prosecuted by the State and with so little, if any, federal concern. Accordingly, we ask you to conduct your own investigation of these matters, because we believe that what we have provided you may constitute only the tip of a very deep iceberg. Without the power of subpoena, which we currently lack, we are unable to dig deeper. We strongly believe that there is far more exculpatory evidence that has not been disclosed, more leaks that we have not yet uncovered and more questionable behavior. This is a case that cries out for a deeper investigation than we are capable of conducting, before any decision to prosecute is permitted. 11

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.