Skip to content
Case File
d-38078House OversightOther

Lawrence Krauss disparages Trump’s NASA funding push in private email

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #032520
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The email contains a personal opinion from a prominent scientist about a Trump administration NASA bill, but provides no concrete evidence, transaction details, or actionable leads linking high‑level Krauss calls the Trump administration’s NASA and defense spending a "show" and criticizes the focus He references a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at a Mars landing. Th

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

policy-criticismscience-policygovernment-spendingtrump-administrationemail-disclosurenasahouse-oversightpotential-insider-information-
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email from Lawrence Krauss criticizing Trump‑related NASA funding

The passage contains a personal opinion email from a physicist about the Trump administration's NASA bill and budget, but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates beyond the email timestamp, or Email dated March 22, 2017 from Lawrence Krauss to an unnamed recipient. Mentions a Washington Post article about Trump signing a NASA bill aimed at a Mars landing. Criticizes the bill as “show” and

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss email referencing Trump NASA bill and criticism of rocket size

The passage contains a brief, informal email from physicist Lawrence Krauss mentioning a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill. It offers no concrete details, transactions, dates beyo Email dated March 22, 2017 from Lawrence Krauss to a private address. References a Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at Mars landing. Criticizes the scientific merit of a r

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss emails expressing concern over Trump‑era NASA funding and DOE science cuts

The passage is a personal email expressing opinion about budget priorities and potential cuts to particle physics. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transaction details, or evidence of mi Krauss warns that a $900 million cut to the DOE Office of Science would harm particle physics resear He characterizes the Trump administration’s focus on large space projects as “glory‑seeking” rathe

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss email warning about NASA Mars rocket funding linked to Trump‑signed bill

The passage contains a brief, unsubstantiated comment from a scientist criticizing a Trump‑signed NASA bill. It mentions President Trump but provides no concrete details, transactions, or actionable l Email dated March 22, 2017 from Lawrence Krauss to a private individual. Krauss criticizes a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at a Mars mission, calling it non‑scientific. Reference to a Washington Post

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawrence Krauss emails expressing concern over NASA budget and potential impact on science funding

The passage contains a private email exchange where a prominent scientist criticizes a presidential administration's space policy. It mentions no concrete transactions, dates beyond the email timestam Krauss argues that increased NASA funding for large rockets will divert money from particle physics He references a $900 million cut to the DOE Office of Science that would affect his field. The ema

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain referencing Trump NASA bill and criticism by Lawrence Krauss

The passage contains a casual email exchange with no concrete details about financial flows, wrongdoing, or specific actions by high‑level officials. It merely mentions a Trump‑signed NASA bill and a Reference to a March 2017 Washington Post article about a Trump‑signed NASA bill aimed at Mars missi Lawrence Krauss, a prominent physicist, expresses skepticism that the initiative advances science

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.