The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questi...
Summary
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
Persons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumpt...
The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumption that the government had also conducted a Google search on a juror. The court questions Brune about why they didn't disclose certain information earlier.
deposition transcript: A-5814
The document is a transcript of a deposition where Ms. Edelstein is questioned about her firm's actions and ethical obligations in a case involving a motion and the government's notification. She testifies that she would have felt comfortable with the court deciding the motion without knowing certain facts, and that the standard is 'actual knowledge'.
The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the government ...
The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the government applies for an immunity order to compel a witness to testify. The application is approved by the Department of Justice and the court grants the order, allowing the witness to testify without fear of self-incrimination.
The defense is requesting that the court preclude the government from cross-examining a witness, Mr....
The defense is requesting that the court preclude the government from cross-examining a witness, Mr. □, about a regulatory settlement agreement, arguing that it is irrelevant and inadmissible under Rules 608 and 403. The witness is a retired British Solicitor who will testify to authenticate documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's purchase of a property.
The letter, filed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, notifies the court and the ...
The letter, filed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, notifies the court and the government of the defendant's intention to present extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements made by witnesses Jane and Carolyn during their testimonies. The letter details specific inconsistencies between the witnesses' trial testimonies and their prior statements as recorded in 3500 materials.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.