The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's par...
Summary
The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's participation in a phone call with the Court. The witness did not discuss the call with Trzaskoma beforehand and is unsure if anyone else did. The testimony highlights potential issues with the firm's communication and candor.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 61102
The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's participation in a phone call with the Court. The witness did not discuss the call with Trzaskoma beforehand and is unsure if anyone else did. The testimony highlights potential issues with the firm's communication and candor.
deposition transcript: A-5809
The witness is questioned about their firm's omissions and potential dishonesty, specifically regarding a phone call with the Court on July 15, and whether Theresa Trzaskoma was prepared for the call. The witness confirms their firm's omissions but denies knowledge of discussions about what Trzaskoma would disclose during the call.
The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing...
The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing due to its tone and content. They mention discussing the letter with their partner Randy Kim and connecting it to information previously shared by Theresa Trzaskoma.
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questi...
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumpt...
The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumption that the government had also conducted a Google search on a juror. The court questions Brune about why they didn't disclose certain information earlier.
The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the government ...
The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the government applies for an immunity order to compel a witness to testify. The application is approved by the Department of Justice and the court grants the order, allowing the witness to testify without fear of self-incrimination.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.