The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the a...
Summary
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the actions of the Brune law firm on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment'. The speaker analyzes the concept of strategic judgment, referencing the Second Circuit and Justice Stevens' dissent, to determine if the firm's actions were a deliberate choice or oversight.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
transcript of a legal discussion or deposition: A-5905
The document discusses whether the Brune firm's actions on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment', and explores the definition of this term through references to Justice Stevens' dissent and Second Circuit guidance.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the actions of the Brune law firm on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment'. The speaker analyzes the concept of strategic judgment, referencing the Second Circuit and Justice Stevens' dissent, to determine if the firm's actions were a deliberate choice or oversight.
The document contains excerpts from a court transcript, featuring testimony from witnesses Sternheim...
The document contains excerpts from a court transcript, featuring testimony from witnesses Sternheim and Brune. Brune's testimony focuses on her ethical obligations as an officer of the court and her actions regarding potential juror misconduct.
The deposition transcript details Brune's testimony about their firm's handling of jury selection, t...
The deposition transcript details Brune's testimony about their firm's handling of jury selection, their team's responsibilities, and observations of juror behavior during the trial, particularly noting juror Conrad's attentiveness and note-taking.
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respond...
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the allege...
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the alleged lack of candor by lawyers Brune & Richard and whether their actions were circumstantial evidence of a strategic decision to game the system.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.