Court Filing - Request for Continuance: 05-23062 mm02
Summary
The defendant requests a continuance of their arraignment, waiving their right to be tried within 90 days, and consents to rescheduling to a later date. The case is reset from 10/9/05 to 10/25/05. The defendant signs and dates the request on 9/22/05.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
court filing: 00631302
The document argues against the defendant's temporary release, citing cases where release was denied due to the trial not being imminent. It also notes that the detention center (MDC) has been responsive to defense counsel's concerns, providing access to the defendant.
court filing: 112062
The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package and other conditions to address concerns regarding risk of flight. The court has inherent authority to reconsider its previous bail decision, and the defendant's new proposal aims to address the court's original concerns. The proposed conditions include a personal recognizance bond, home confinement with GPS monitoring, and restricted travel.
court filing: 1:21-cr-50080
The document is a court filing by the government in opposition to a defendant's renewed motion for release, discussing the nature of the offense, evidence, and defendant's characteristics. It presents the government's arguments against the defendant's release. The filing is part of a criminal case (1:21-cr-50080-AJ).
court filing: 20 Cr. 78 (AT)
The document argues against the defendant's temporary release, citing cases where release was denied due to the trial not being imminent. It also notes that the detention center has been responsive to defense counsel's concerns and has provided access to the defendant.
Court Filing: 20-00330-cr
The court denied the defendant's request to modify a protective order that governed the use of discovery materials produced by the government in a criminal case. The court had previously entered the protective order on July 30, 2020, finding good cause existed. The defendant sought to use documents produced in the criminal case for purposes other than the defense of the criminal action.
court filing: 20-2000X08BAJND Document 838-3
The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should not be sealed in its entirety, as the common law and First Amendment presume public access to judicial documents. The court notes that limited redactions may be justified for sensitive information, but wholesale sealing is not warranted.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.