Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-625House OversightDeposition

The speaker is criticizing the lawyers involved in a case for not properly investigating or reportin...

The speaker is criticizing the lawyers involved in a case for not properly investigating or reporting a potential issue with a juror's identity, instead making a 'tragic misjudgment' that led to further complications. The speaker argues that the lawyers should have either investigated further or informed the court about the issue. The judge is referenced as having also criticized the lawyers' actions as a 'tragic misjudgment'.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-625
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The speaker is criticizing the lawyers involved in a case for not properly investigating or reporting a potential issue with a juror's identity, instead making a 'tragic misjudgment' that led to further complications. The speaker argues that the lawyers should have either investigated further or informed the court about the issue. The judge is referenced as having also criticized the lawyers' actions as a 'tragic misjudgment'.

Tags

Juror misconduct or misidentificationCriticism of lawyers' judgment in handling a situationPotential waiver or misjudgment in a court case
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.