Skip to content
Case File
d-635House OversightLegal Filing

This document is a court filing listing various trial exhibits, including faxes, letters, emails, an...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-635
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

This document is a court filing listing various trial exhibits, including faxes, letters, emails, and memoranda, related to a case involving multiple defendants. The exhibits are referenced in relation to a motion for a new trial or evidentiary hearing concerning juror misconduct. The list includes correspondence between various individuals and entities.

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

Trial ExhibitsJuror MisconductMotion for a New Trial
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-00386-LPA

This document is a court filing listing various trial exhibits, including faxes, letters, emails, and memoranda, related to a case involving multiple defendants. The exhibits are referenced in relation to a motion for a new trial or evidentiary hearing concerning juror misconduct. The list includes correspondence between various individuals and entities.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court Opinion on Personal Jurisdiction in 9/11 Terrorist Attack Litigation

The passage is a standard legal analysis of jurisdictional standards and discovery discretion, containing no specific allegations, names, financial flows, or controversial actions involving high‑profi Distinguishes specific vs. general jurisdiction for defendants. Lists factors courts consider when assessing reasonableness of jurisdiction. Notes courts have broad discretion to order jurisdictional

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Procedural appellate review of 9/11 terrorism support lawsuits

The document outlines jurisdictional and procedural issues in appellate review of existing 9/11 lawsuits, without revealing new allegations, financial flows, or specific powerful actors. It offers lim Plaintiffs allege material support to al‑Qaeda by five defendants under the Anti‑Terrorism Act. Multiple defendants were dismissed in prior district‑court orders (2005‑2010). Appeals were filed in Au

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Plaintiff’s Motion for Costs, Protection Order, and Jury Trial in Case 1:16‑cv‑04642

The passage is a routine pleading requesting attorney fees, a protection order, and a jury trial. It contains no substantive allegations, names of powerful actors, financial flows, or controversial ac Filed June 20, 2016 in SDNY case 1:16‑cv‑04642 Plaintiff seeks costs, attorney fees, and a protection order against unnamed defendants Requests a jury trial on all triable issues

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Court docket entry for case Bradley J. Edwards v. Alan M. Dershowitz et al., includes videotaped deposition of Paul G. Cassel

The document is a basic docket listing with dates, locations, and parties involved. It provides no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level officials, limiting its inve Case filed in Broward County Circuit Court (case no. CACE 15‑0). Plaintiffs: Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassel. Defendants include Alan M. Dershowitz and others.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This is a court filing by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, requesting that submiss...

This is a court filing by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, requesting that submissions related to Juror No. 50 remain under seal until the court rules on the Motion for a New Trial filed on January 19, 2022.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.