Skip to content
Case File
d-6431Court UnsealedCorrespondence

Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Suppress Evidence: 140

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 140
Pages
21
Persons
5

Summary

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the government's subpoena to a third party was unconstitutional and violated her rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, as well as the Martindell principle. They seek to suppress evidence obtained from this subpoena and dismiss certain counts.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Reply Memorandum: 103

This reply memorandum supports Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, arguing that the government's case relies heavily on the testimony of three witnesses without significant contemporaneous documentary evidence. Maxwell's defense presents a substantial bail package, including a bond secured by her and her spouse's assets and additional sureties, arguing that these conditions reasonably assure her appearance in court.

14p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss: 124

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the Superseding Indictment is too vague, failing to identify specific dates, accusers, or details of alleged crimes, and thus violates her constitutional rights. They request that Counts One through Four be dismissed or that the court direct the government to provide a Bill of Particulars.

8p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion: 134

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the government circumvented a protective order in a civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, to obtain evidence used in her criminal prosecution. They request that the court suppress this evidence and dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment due to the government's alleged misconduct.

23p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Strike Surplusage: 146

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to strike surplusage from the superseding indictment, arguing that allegations regarding Accuser-3 are irrelevant, prejudicial, and should be stricken or subject to the admissibility requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). The memorandum contests the government's inclusion of Accuser-3's allegations, claiming they do not support the charges against Maxwell.

15p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Memorandum of Law: 148

This memorandum of law supports Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a bill of particulars and pretrial disclosures, requesting the court to order the government to provide specific information and evidence. The motion includes requests for disclosure of exculpatory and impeachment material under Brady and Giglio, as well as other evidentiary materials. The document is a key part of Maxwell's defense strategy in her criminal trial.

23p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Reply Memorandum: 11032

This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion for bail in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is part of the legal proceedings against Maxwell. It outlines the legal arguments and reasoning in favor of granting Maxwell bail.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.