Court Order and related correspondence: 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP)
Summary
The court denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay the unsealing process in the civil case, citing that the new information she refers to is subject to a protective order in the criminal case and she is not at liberty to disclose it. Maxwell's counsel had informed the court of the new information and its potential implications on both the civil and criminal cases.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
Related Documents (6)
Court Transcript: 136-9
The transcript is of a court hearing where Judge Loretta A. Preska discusses the unsealing of documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell. The court considers the presumption of public access to judicial documents and countervailing interests, ultimately rejecting Maxwell's arguments that unsealing certain documents would jeopardize her right to a fair trial.
SEALED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: 311-4
The document is a sealed memorandum decision and order granting the government's application to modify a protective order in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case, allowing Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to comply with a grand jury subpoena. The protective order was originally entered to protect confidential materials produced during discovery. The court granted the modification despite the pending appeal regarding the unsealing of certain documents.
Court Filing - Protective Order: 121-6
The court issues a Protective Order governing the handling of confidential information in the case of Virginia Roberts Giuffre vs. Ghislaine Maxwell, defining what constitutes 'CONFIDENTIAL' information and outlining permissible disclosures.
Court Order: 20-cv-00783
The court order, issued by Judge Loretta A. Preska, denies a motion to stay the unsealing process but allows for renewal if a protective order is modified. The order was dated August 12, 2020, in New York.
Court Filing: 243
The defense responds to the government's letter regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence, arguing that the government's assurances are insufficient to safeguard Maxwell's constitutional rights and that the court should resolve the motions before trial.
Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 307
The document is an Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena to her former civil litigation law firm. The court ruled that the evidence should not be suppressed despite Maxwell's claims that it was obtained in violation of her rights. The decision is based on the court's analysis of the protective order in the civil case and its modification by another judge.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.