court filing: 18-cr-390 (RMB)
Summary
The court filing discusses the defendant's bail proposal and the government's objections, highlighting concerns about the defendant's alleged unlawful acts and the inadequacy of proposed bail conditions to ensure public safety.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Court Order: 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 38
The court order restricts the use, disclosure, and filing of discovery materials provided by the government to the defendant and their counsel, with specific guidelines for handling confidential information and prohibiting public disclosure of certain details.
Court Order: 37-1
The court order outlines the terms for the defendant's use and disclosure of discovery materials provided by the government, emphasizing confidentiality and restrictions on sharing sensitive information. It categorizes materials as 'Confidential Information' and 'Highly Confidential Information' with specific handling instructions for each. The order aims to protect the privacy of individuals and prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity.
Court Order: 476
The court orders the Government to reply to the Defendant's response regarding the authentication of Government Exhibit 52 and sets a deadline for proposed redactions to motion papers. The dispute centers on whether Employee-1 can authenticate the document given that Mr. Rodriguez, a former employee, allegedly removed it from the property before Employee-1 began working for Jeffrey Epstein.
Court Filing: 92
The document includes a letter from the government requesting an extension of the deadline for producing electronic discovery, which was granted by the court. It also includes a court order regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement and the government's obligations to ensure her access to legal materials.
The court orders the Government to reply to the Defendant's response regarding the authentication of...
The court orders the Government to reply to the Defendant's response regarding the authentication of Government Exhibit 52 and sets a deadline for proposed redactions to motion papers. The dispute centers on whether Employee-1 can authenticate the document given that Mr. Rodriguez, a former employee, allegedly removed it from the property before Employee-1 began working for Jeffrey Epstein.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary (1)]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.