court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
Summary
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the actions of the Brune law firm on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment'. The speaker analyzes the concept of strategic judgment, referencing the Second Circuit and Justice Stevens' dissent, to determine if the firm's actions were a deliberate choice or oversight.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
transcript of a legal discussion or deposition: A-5905
The document discusses whether the Brune firm's actions on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment', and explores the definition of this term through references to Justice Stevens' dissent and Second Circuit guidance.
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the a...
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the actions of the Brune law firm on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment'. The speaker analyzes the concept of strategic judgment, referencing the Second Circuit and Justice Stevens' dissent, to determine if the firm's actions were a deliberate choice or oversight.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 16166320 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The document appears to be a transcript of a court hearing or argument where an attorney is discussing the strategic decisions made during juror selection, specifically regarding a juror with a 'checkered history'. The attorney argues that their decision was not a 'sandbagging' tactic, but rather a genuine change of heart after re-evaluating the juror's note.
transcript: A-5906
The transcript discusses a case where an attorney, Theresa, had second thoughts about a juror and investigated further, ultimately deciding to keep the juror. The discussion highlights the government's view that the decision was strategic and aimed at securing an acquittal.
Court Transcript: 1616220
The document contains excerpts from a court transcript, featuring testimony from witnesses Sternheim and Brune. Brune's testimony focuses on her ethical obligations as an officer of the court and her actions regarding potential juror misconduct.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the alleged lack of candor by lawyers Brune & Richard and whether their actions were circumstantial evidence of a strategic decision to game the system.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.