court filing: 1:20-cv-02484-DG
Summary
The document discusses the defendant's request to stay civil proceedings due to a parallel criminal case, citing concerns about the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. The plaintiff argues that a stay would cause her harm due to ongoing effects of alleged abuse. The court weighs the interests of both parties in considering the request.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: Case 1:20-cv-00803-RP Document 122-20 Filed 06/04/21 Page 63 of 8
Ms. Maxwell requests the court to order the Plaintiff to disclose information about alleged ongoing criminal investigations or stay the proceedings. The Plaintiff has represented that she is part of an ongoing investigation involving Ms. Maxwell, but Ms. Maxwell is unaware of any such investigation. The Defendant's counsel has attempted to verify the existence of the investigation with the Assistant United States Attorney.
court filing: 20-00184-DG
The document discusses Maxwell's request for a stay of the court proceedings until the conclusion of her pending criminal case, to which the Co-Executors consent and the Plaintiff vigorously opposes. The Co-Executors argue that a partial stay would prejudice their ability to defend against the Plaintiff's claims. The Plaintiff contends that Maxwell's detention should not impede her defense and that Maxwell is seeking an unfair advantage.
court filing: 28589
The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, objects to the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit, arguing that the additional depositions seek irrelevant and inadmissible evidence. Maxwell contends that the case is a simple defamation claim and that the plaintiff's attempts to introduce evidence about other alleged victims and Epstein's organization are extraneous and should not be allowed.
Court Filing: 2:20-cv-00839-JES-MRM
The document discusses the defendant's motion to compel the plaintiff to provide discovery information or, alternatively, to stay the proceedings due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery obligations. The plaintiff is claiming a non-existent 'investigative privilege' related to an alleged ongoing criminal investigation. The defendant argues that the information is necessary for adequate preparation for the plaintiff's deposition and other discovery matters.
court filing or memorandum: Case 1:20-cv-00839-JEB Document 22-20 Filed 04/16/21 Page 6 of 8
The document analyzes the factors for staying a civil case against Ms. Maxwell, concluding that a stay is warranted due to the overlap with a potential criminal investigation and the plaintiff's control over relevant information. The court weighs the interests of the parties and the public, ultimately finding that disclosure is necessary for an informed decision. The case involves allegations of 'trafficking' by Ms. Maxwell against the plaintiff from 1999 to 2001.
Court Filing: 120366008380
The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requested to modify a protective order to disclose certain documents to judicial officers in related civil cases. The court denied the request, finding that the defendant failed to establish good cause, but allowed limited disclosure of certain factual information under seal.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.