Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-6726Court UnsealedDeposition

deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03303-PAE

The deposition transcript shows Edelstein being questioned about their knowledge of an investigation conducted by Theresa Trzaskoma and the accuracy of a statement regarding when the investigation began. Edelstein's testimony appears to be inconsistent, and they are pressed to clarify their answers.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 1:20-cv-03303-pae
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The deposition transcript shows Edelstein being questioned about their knowledge of an investigation conducted by Theresa Trzaskoma and the accuracy of a statement regarding when the investigation began. Edelstein's testimony appears to be inconsistent, and they are pressed to clarify their answers.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: 1:20-cv-03303-pae
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03308-PAE Document 61602 Filed 02/24/22 Page 119 of 130

The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' knowledge and investigation into Catherine Conrad. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of certain statements while also revealing her awareness of Theresa Trzaskoma's discovery of the Appellate Division suspension report.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5805

The witness, Edelstein, is questioned about their knowledge of an investigation conducted by Theresa Trzaskoma prior to receiving a letter. Edelstein's responses suggest a discrepancy between their understanding of the investigation's timeline and the facts presented by the questioning attorney.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

Deposition Transcript: A-5804

The deposition of Ms. Edelstein discusses the accuracy of statements in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' investigation into Catherine Conrad and their awareness of an Appellate Division suspension report. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of a statement in the brief but is questioned about the timing and extent of the investigation. The transcript highlights potential inconsistencies in the defendants' claims.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5796

The witness, Edelstein, is being questioned about their investigation and computer research related to Catherine Conrad. The questioning focuses on what information was known on May 12th and whether certain research could have been done at that time. The witness's responses indicate some discrepancies in their previous statements.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5919

The document appears to be a court transcript where the speaker is arguing that the defense counsel's decision not to disclose certain information about a juror was a deliberate strategy, and therefore, not ineffective assistance of counsel. The speaker references evidence and testimony that supports their claim. The discussion centers around the defense counsel's actions during voir dire and subsequent investigation regarding Juror No. 1.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5788

The witness testifies that they discussed a Westlaw report with their partner Randy Kim, but did not discuss it with Susan Brune or Theresa Trzaskoma. The witness also states they did not see certain email exchanges until after a court conference.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.