Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-30038-PAE
Summary
The document appears to be a list of exhibits filed in a court case, including records of Catherine Conrad/Rosa and Frank Rosa's criminal history, as well as documents related to a previous court case, Conrad v. Manessis.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Exhibit list to a declaration: doj-ogr-00009912
This document is an index of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration, listing various court records, criminal records, and lawsuit documents related to Catherine Conrad/Rosa and Frank Rosa. The exhibits cover a range of topics, including arrests, court proceedings, and lawsuits. The document provides a catalog of evidence or supporting materials for a larger case or filing.
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 120ec1-003308
This document is a list of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration in a court case, including documents related to Catherine M. Conrad's attorney registration, disciplinary history, marriage, and property records.
Court Filing - Exhibit List: Case 1:20-cv-03888-N/A Document #: 345 Filed: 03/22/21 Page 61 of 767
This document is a list of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration in a court case, including documents related to Catherine M. Conrad's attorney registration, disciplinary history, marriage, and property records.
deposition transcript: 1616620
The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant, conversations about a juror's identity, and the team's response to new information about the juror. The testimony reveals details about the team's actions and potential inconsistencies in their statements.
deposition transcript: 16166201
The deposition transcript details Brune's testimony about their firm's handling of jury selection, their team's responsibilities, and observations of juror behavior during the trial, particularly noting juror Conrad's attentiveness and note-taking.
court filing or legal memorandum: 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522
The document discusses the lawyers' statements about their reaction to a juror's letter and their investigation into the juror's background, concluding that the statements were true as reasonably read and did not constitute a knowing misrepresentation under Rule 3.3.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.