Skip to content
Case File
d-6807Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: 20-370088

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 20-370088
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The document appears to be a court filing arguing that a person who has lost French nationality should not be protected from extradition under Article 696-4 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure, citing instances where the French government has deported individuals deprived of their French nationality for criminal offenses.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Exhibit Document: 20-1700088

The document discusses the case of Djamel Beghal, a dual French-Algerian citizen who was deprived of his French nationality and deported to Algeria. It highlights the French government's use of citizenship deprivation as a means to facilitate removal from France, and the complexities surrounding extradition and deportation under European human rights law.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 2016-10-D36-Amt Document 112021 Filed 03/23/21 Page 6 of 18

The document is a court filing arguing that a person who has lost French nationality should not be protected from extradition under Article 696-4 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure, citing instances where the French government has deported individuals deprived of their nationality for criminal offenses.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 2017-00330-AUM-Document 010302 Filed 03/28/20 Page 8 of 15

The document is a court filing by the defense, responding to government allegations that Ms. Maxwell is a flight risk. It argues that the government's interpretations are unfounded and that Ms. Maxwell's actions were taken to protect herself and her family, not to flee. The defense also contests the government's views on extradition from France and the UK.

1p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Memorandum/Opinion: 20-cr-00880-AJN Document 11-02 Filed 03/23/21 Page d31of518

The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters.

1p
Court UnsealedOtherUnknown

Expert Opinion or Affidavit: 201-700320

The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French national to the US, analyzing the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, and relevant agreements. Julié concludes that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals and that the French government is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met. The document highlights the importance of considering the discretionary power in extradition decisions and the impact of subsequent agreements on the Extradition Treaty.

1p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Response to government's memorandum: 2016603608

The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion for release, written by William Julié, a French lawyer. It analyzes the French Minister of Justice's letter and argues that the key question is whether France can extradite a French national under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, not under French legislation. The document highlights the precedence of international agreements over national legislation according to the French Constitution.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.