Court Filing: 20-cr-330 (ajn)
The document is a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, containing multiple orders and opinions from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's bail motions and conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
Summary
The document is a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, containing multiple orders and opinions from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's bail motions and conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA00027268
EFTA00017821
Court Filing: 12702
The document consists of two letters submitted to the court regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The first letter, dated November 23, 2020, updates the court on Maxwell's quarantine status after a staff member tested positive for COVID-19. The second letter, dated December 1, 2020, discusses the parties' disagreement on whether the warden should appear in court to address concerns about Maxwell's detention conditions.
Court Filing: 20-cv-00880
The document is a joint letter submitted by the prosecution and defense in response to the Court's order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of detention. The parties disagree on whether MDC legal counsel should submit a written response or Warden Heriberto Tellez should appear before the Court to address the concerns raised by the defense.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 75
The letter, written by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, responds to the government's report on Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions, arguing that the government's account is incomplete and omits several issues, including the deletion of email correspondence, inadequate medical care, and excessive surveillance. The defense requests that the Court summon the MDC Warden to report on Ms. Maxwell's conditions of detention.
EFTA00010196
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.