court filing: 20-cr-608 (AT)
Summary
The court maintains its decision to detain the defendant due to concerns about her risk of flight, citing the complexity of extradition processes and her significant financial resources and international ties. The defendant's French citizenship and potential extradition waivers are considered, but the court remains unconvinced that these factors mitigate the risk of flight. The defendant's financial resources and history of avoiding detection also contribute to the court's decision.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
court filing: 112062
The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package and other conditions to address concerns regarding risk of flight. The court has inherent authority to reconsider its previous bail decision, and the defendant's new proposal aims to address the court's original concerns. The proposed conditions include a personal recognizance bond, home confinement with GPS monitoring, and restricted travel.
Court Filing: 20-00330-cr
The court denied the defendant's request to modify a protective order that governed the use of discovery materials produced by the government in a criminal case. The court had previously entered the protective order on July 30, 2020, finding good cause existed. The defendant sought to use documents produced in the criminal case for purposes other than the defense of the criminal action.
court filing: 20-2000X08BAJND Document 838-3
The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should not be sealed in its entirety, as the common law and First Amendment presume public access to judicial documents. The court notes that limited redactions may be justified for sensitive information, but wholesale sealing is not warranted.
court filing: 20-CR-033 (LJL)
The court denied the defendant's request to modify a protective order that governed the use of discovery materials produced by the government in a criminal case. The court found that the defendant had not sufficiently substantiated a request to deviate from the status quo. The protective order was originally entered on July 30, 2020.
court filing: 21-00338
The document discusses the defendant's third motion for release on bail, the government's opposition, and the legal standards governing bail under the Eighth Amendment and the Bail Reform Act. The court considers its jurisdiction to grant the motion while the defendant's bail appeal is pending. The court ultimately denies the defendant's motion without resolving the jurisdictional question.
court filing: 3550
The Government responds to the Court's Order regarding the delivery of legal mail to the defendant, explaining that expedited delivery is not practicable and that the MDC's legal department has various responsibilities for 1,700 inmates. The Government details the delivery of a hard drive containing Court-ordered disclosures and explains that an institutional emergency impacted delivery on one day.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.