Legal Memorandum or Analysis: 2016-08-28-2016-06
Summary
The document analyzes the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and concludes that it does not preclude the extradition of French nationals. It also critiques the use of the Peterson case as a precedent for denying extradition, arguing that the decision was discretionary and not a judicial ruling.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Legal Memorandum/Expert Opinion: Case 1:04-cr-00320-AJT Document 1033-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 366 of 4
The document is a legal analysis by William Julié, a French lawyer, discussing the extradition laws between France and the USA. It argues that the French government has discretion to extradite its nationals under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, and questions the relevance of the Peterson case as a precedent. The analysis highlights the difference between a judicial decision and a discretionary decision by the French Ministry of Justice in extradition matters.
Legal Memorandum or Expert Opinion: 2016-08-03-BA-Just-Doc-#110021
The document analyzes the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, concluding that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals. It references a letter by US Senators Durbin and Obama and discusses the impact of a later EU-US Agreement on extradition, suggesting that France is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met.
Expert Opinion or Affidavit: 201-700320
The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French national to the US, analyzing the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, and relevant agreements. Julié concludes that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals and that the French government is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met. The document highlights the importance of considering the discretionary power in extradition decisions and the impact of subsequent agreements on the Extradition Treaty.
Expert Opinion/Declaration: 103-1
The document is an expert opinion by French lawyer William Julié on the extradition laws between the US and France. Julié argues that the French Minister of Justice's letter, which stated that France does not extradite its citizens outside the EU, is misleading and that the Extradition Treaty between the US and France gives France discretion to extradite its nationals. Julié also critiques the government's reliance on the Peterson case as a precedent.
court filing: 20-cr-60083
The document is a court filing arguing against the defendant's renewed bail motion, citing the strength of the government's evidence, the defendant's significant foreign ties and financial resources, and her demonstrated ability to hide assets. The government contests the defendant's claims regarding extradition laws and her ability to flee or hide.
Court Filing - Letter to the Judge: 10021
Annie Farmer, a victim of Ghislaine Maxwell's abuse, submits a statement opposing Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. She describes Maxwell's history of abuse, manipulation, and lack of remorse, and argues that releasing her on bail would put her at risk of fleeing and avoiding trial. Farmer requests that the court deny Maxwell's bail request to ensure justice is served.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.