Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-6964Court UnsealedOther

Expert Opinion or Affidavit: 201-700320

The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French national to the US, analyzing the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, and relevant agreements. Julié concludes that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals and that the French government is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met. The document highlights the importance of considering the discretionary power in extradition decisions and the impact of subsequent agreements on the Extradition Treaty.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 201-700320
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French national to the US, analyzing the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, and relevant agreements. Julié concludes that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals and that the French government is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met. The document highlights the importance of considering the discretionary power in extradition decisions and the impact of subsequent agreements on the Extradition Treaty.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Legal Memorandum/Expert Opinion: Case 1:04-cr-00320-AJT Document 1033-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 366 of 4

The document is a legal analysis by William Julié, a French lawyer, discussing the extradition laws between France and the USA. It argues that the French government has discretion to extradite its nationals under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, and questions the relevance of the Peterson case as a precedent. The analysis highlights the difference between a judicial decision and a discretionary decision by the French Ministry of Justice in extradition matters.

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

17 August 16 through August 31 2016_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Juan Mendez Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:10 AM Brenda A. McKinley; C. Kay Woodring; Caitlyn D. Neff; Danielle Minarchick; Eric A. Lockridge; Jeffrey T. Hite; Jonathan M. Millinder; Julie A. Simoni; Kevin T. Jeirles; Larry L. Lidgett; Lee R. Sheaffer; Lorinda L. Brown; Matthew T. Fisher; Melanie L. Gordon; Michael S. Woods; Richard C. Smith; Stephanie D. McGhee; Thomas S. Allen, Jr.; Walter E. Jeirles Calendar and Status Report 8/16/2016 20

1846p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016784

0p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Legal Memorandum or Expert Opinion: 2016-08-03-BA-Just-Doc-#110021

The document analyzes the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, concluding that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals. It references a letter by US Senators Durbin and Obama and discusses the impact of a later EU-US Agreement on extradition, suggesting that France is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01655304

11p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01681865

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.